It is known as the Ballot initiative. The ballot initiative is a method by which a request of marked by a specific least number of enrolled voters can achieve an open vote on a proposed statute or protected revision.
<span>Ballot initiative may appear as either the immediate or backhanded activity. Under the immediate action, a measure is put specifically to a vote subsequent to being put together by an appeal.</span>
Yes. The National Center for Education Statistics publishes the Public high school 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate.
What is the adjusted cohort graduation rate?
- The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate (ACGR) refers to the number of students who graduate from high school in four years with a regular high school diploma divided by the number of students who form the adjusted cohort for the graduating class.
- The Public high school 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate is described in the form of a table which can describe the data easily.
- The data can be obtained for the national as well as the state level for the fifty states.
- The Public high school 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate can also be obtained by race/ ethnicity.
- It is used as an indicator.
- It is published by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
- In the year 2018-2019 the national adjusted cohort graduation rate was 86 percent, which is the highest since the rate was first measured in 2010-2011.
To learn more about National Center for Education Statistics, refer: brainly.com/question/10404402
#SPJ4
Answer:
La soberanía popular, también llamada soberanía de los ocupantes ilegales, en la historia de los EE. UU., Una doctrina política controvertida según la cual la gente de los territorios federales debería decidir por sí misma si sus territorios ingresarían a la Unión como estados libres o esclavos. Sus enemigos, especialmente en Nueva Inglaterra, lo llamaron "soberanía ilegal".
Explanation:
Popular sovereignty, also called squatter sovereignty, in U.S. history, a controversial political doctrine according to which the people of federal territories should decide for themselves whether their territories would enter the Union as free or slave states. Its enemies, especially in New England, called it “squatter sovereignty.
Such tendentious revisionism may provide a useful corrective to older enthusiastic assessments, but it fails to capture a larger historical tragedy: Jacksonian Democracy was an authentic democratic movement, dedicated to powerful, at times radical, egalitarian ideals—but mainly for white men.
Socially and intellectually, the Jacksonian movement represented not the insurgency of a specific class or region but a diverse, sometimes testy national coalition. Its origins stretch back to the democratic stirrings of the American Revolution, the Antifederalists of the 1780s and 1790s, and the Jeffersonian Democratic Republicans. More directly, it arose out of the profound social and economic changes of the early nineteenth century.
Recent historians have analyzed these changes in terms of a market revolution. In the Northeast and Old Northwest, rapid transportation improvements and immigration hastened the collapse of an older yeoman and artisan economy and its replacement by cash-crop agriculture and capitalist manufacturing. In the South, the cotton boom revived a flagging plantation slave economy, which spread to occupy the best lands of the region. In the West, the seizure of lands from Native Americans and mixed-blood Hispanics opened up fresh areas for white settlement and cultivation—and for speculation.
Not everyone benefited equally from the market revolution, least of all those nonwhites for whom it was an unmitigated disaster. Jacksonianism, however, would grow directly from the tensions it generated within white society. Mortgaged farmers and an emerging proletariat in the Northeast, nonslaveholders in the South, tenants and would-be yeomen in the West—all had reasons to think that the spread of commerce and capitalism would bring not boundless opportunities but new forms of dependence. And in all sections of the country, some of the rising entrepreneurs of the market revolution suspected that older elites would block their way and shape economic development to suit themselves.
