The old rate of pay is x and the new rate is y then we have:
y = 2x + 7
Y = 21
PART 1: 21 = 2x+7
Subtract 7 from each side:
14 = 2x
Divide both sides by 2:
X = 14 / 2
X = 7
PART 2: The internship pays $7 per hour.
Irfan must walk a distance of <u>25</u> blocks <u>east</u> to return to his apartment building.
<h3>What is a compass?</h3>
A compass can be defined as a scientific instrument that contains a magnetized pointer, which is used to show and indicate the following four (4) main cardinal directions:
<h3>What is distance?</h3>
Distance can be defined as the amount of ground covered (traveled) by a physical object over a specific period of time and speed, regardless of its direction, starting point or ending point.
Next, we would calculate the total distance covered (traveled) by Irfan as follows:
Total distance = 20 + 5
Total distance = 25 blocks.
Since Irfan walked a total distance of 25 blocks west, he would have to walk the same distance in the opposite direction (east) to return to his apartment building.
Read more on total distance here: brainly.com/question/19460590
#SPJ1
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
