Well for a start, this makes absolutely no sense, "discovered a fuel that burns so hot that it becomes cold."
<span>And yes, it's not science if the experiment can't be repeated. In fact they should WANT it to be repeated so that you can get credit for discovering something new and then possibly harness this effect to produce useful applications. </span>
<span>For all we know they had a fewer of LN2 in the lab that got shredded by the blast, LN2 could certainly have frozen many things (not metal though, since metal is already solid at room temperature, (except for mercury)), and afterwards would leave no trace.</span>
Nitrogen has 7 protons, 7 neutrons, and 7 electrons.
Seven protons, seven neutrons, and seven electrons make up nitrogen-14.
Utilize the atomic number and mass number of an atom to determine the number of subatomic particles it contains: Atomic number Equals proton count. Electron count equals atomic number. Atomic number - mass number equals the number of neutrons.
Seven protons, seven neutrons, and seven electrons make up the atom of nitrogen. The nucleus is the collection of protons and neutrons that make up the center of an atom. The 7 electrons, which are much smaller than the nucleus, orbit it in what is known as orbits. Since nitrogen-14 is a neutral atom, the number of protons in its nucleus must match the number of electrons around it.
Learn more about atomic numbers at brainly.com/question/2942556
#SPJ4.
I think B. As an idea is just a way that could be possible
Answer:
reflection
Explanation:
the moon reflects sunlight causing it to look brighter. the sun is not a medium as light doesn't require a. medium to travel. nor is a moon concave...
hope it helps
Answer:

Explanation:
If we want to convert from grams to moles, the molar mass is used. This is the mass of 1 mole. They are found on the Periodic Table as the atomic masses, but the units are grams per mole (g/mol) instead of atomic mass units (amu).
Look up the molar mass of carbon.
Set up a ratio using the molar mass.

Since we are converting 3.06 grams to moles, we multiply by that value.

Flip the ratio. This way, the ratio is still equivalent, but the units of grams of carbon cancel.

The original measurement of grams (3.06) has 3 significant figures, so our answer must have the same. For the number we calculated, that is the thousandth place.
The 7 in the ten-thousandth place tells us to round the 4 up to a 5.

3.06 grams of carbon is approximately <u>0.255 moles of carbon.</u>