1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
padilas [110]
3 years ago
13

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
fenix001 [56]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:the correct answer is D

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Help me please !<br> 4,5 and 6
andreev551 [17]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  4a. ∠V≅∠Y

  4b. TU ≅ WX

  5. No; no applicable postulate

  6. see below

Step-by-step explanation:

<h3>4.</h3>

a. When you use the ASA postulate, you are claiming you have shown two angles and the side between them to be congruent. Here, you're given side TV and angle T are congruent to their counterparts, sides WY and angle W. The angle at the other end of segment TV is angle V. Its counterpart is the other end of segment WY from angle W. In order to use ASA, we must show ...

  ∠V≅∠Y

__

b. When you use the SAS postulate, you are claiming you have shown two sides and the angle between them are congruent. The angle T is between sides TV and TU. The angle congruent to that, ∠W, is between sides WY and WX. Then the missing congruence that must be shown is ...

  TU ≅ WX

__

<h3>5.</h3>

The marked congruences are for two sides and a non-included angle. There is no SSA postulate for proving congruence. (In fact, there are two different possible triangles that have the given dimensions. This can be seen in the fact that the given angle is opposite the shortest of the given sides.)

  "No, we cannot prove they are congruent because none of the five postulates or theorems can be used."

__

<h3>6.</h3>

The first statement/reason is always the list of "given" statements.

1. ∠A≅∠D, AC≅DC . . . . given

2. . . . . vertical angles are congruent

3. . . . . ASA postulate

4. . . . . CPCTC

8 0
3 years ago
How can I use two unit multipliers to convert 42 centimeters to feet?
eimsori [14]

Answer:

1.38 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

42 cm x <u> 3.28 ft  </u>

              100 cm

= 1.38 ft

there are plenty of printable unit conversion on google

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chandra spends 15 minutes doing 4 math problems.She spends the same amount of of time on each problem.How many minutes does she
Serjik [45]

Answer: 3 minutes and 45 seconds

Step-by-step explanation: first, you divide 15 by 4 and that's your answer. Hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Need help on this question asap please
yanalaym [24]

we know, that the angle formed by an arc at the center of the circle is two times the angle formed by same arc on any point on the circumference,

So,

=》

angle \: 1 = 2 \times angle \: 2

hence, correct answer is B.

6 0
3 years ago
What is x-2y=1, solve for y
GREYUIT [131]
The answer is X=1+2y

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 8. AI, Bob, Carol, and Diane shared a $1000 prize. Bob got twice as much as AI,
    10·1 answer
  • Make a 10 or 100 to subtract mentally 76-59 =
    14·2 answers
  • 9*10^2 is ____ times as much as 3*10^-2<br><br> a) 3*10^4 b) 6*10^4 c) 6*10^0 d) 3* 10^-4
    7·1 answer
  • Find the lateral surface area and the total surface area.
    10·2 answers
  • If u(x) = x5 – x4 + x2 and v(x) = –x2, which expression is equivalent to (StartFraction u Over v EndFraction) (x)? x3 – x2 –x3 +
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone help me really please
    9·2 answers
  • Write the edge of the cube in terms of its volume​
    9·2 answers
  • Help pls hdhjdhdjdjjd
    12·1 answer
  • What is the remainder when the polynomial 8x2 4x−3 is divided by 2x−1?.
    7·1 answer
  • What additional piece of information would prove △LMK≅△NMK by Side Angle Side?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!