Answer:
COGS= $598,020
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Kevin owns a retail store, and during the current year, he purchased $610,000 worth of inventory. Kevin's beginning inventory was $67,000, and his ending inventory is $77,200. During the year, Kevin withdrew $1,780 in inventory for his personal use.
We need to deduct the inventory used for personal use.
To calculate the cost of goods sold, we need to use the following formula:
COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods purchased - ending finished inventory
COGS= 67,000 + 610,000 - 77,200 - 1,780
COGS= $598,020
Answer:
C. A country can specialize in producing that for which it has a comparative advantage and then trade for other needed goods and services.
Explanation:
<em>Comparative advantage</em> is simply evaluating the opportunity cost of other benefits or costs, if the country is opting to choose for a specific category of goods for production purposes.
For example, let's say US can produce 20 Television (TV) sets and 50 Air Conditioners in a month. Here, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 Air Conditioners. Similarly, the opportunity cost of producing 1 Air Conditioner (AC) is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 TV set. Hence, US should produce Air Conditioners over TV sets as per <em>Comparative Advantage</em> concept.
Take another example, let's say UK can produce 50 Television (TV) sets and 20 Air Conditioners in a month. Hence, the opportunity cost of producing 1 TV set is 20/50 i.e. 0.4 Air Conditioner. On the other hand, the opportunity cost of producing 1 AC is 50/20 i.e. 2.5 TV sets. Thus, UK should produce TV sets over AC's as per <em>Comparative Advantage </em>model.
Hence, US should export AC's to UK and import TV sets from UK to gain from specialization and trade.
<em> In this way nations can gain from specialization and trade by making use of Comparative Advantage theory</em>.
It is to be noted that <em>Absolute Advantage model </em>of Adam Smith is also good as it highlights production of that good by a country, which it can produce in large quantities with fewer resources and minimal time than any other nation in the world. But the <em>Comparative Advantage Model </em>developed by David Ricardo considers opportunity cost and is much more refined than Absolute Advantage Model.
<em></em>
Answer:
Balance of payments (BOP)
Explanation:
The balance of payments is referred to details of the transaction that held between two entities either in the same country or outside the country of a particular time period.
when the transaction was done for another country, there is a deduction of credit from the balance of payment and when transaction was done for the same country then credit is added to the BOP
Answer:
Yes, they need to increase Upper L which would cause MP Subscript Upper L to decrease and MP Subscript Upper C to increase.
Explanation:
In the specific problem outlined above, the company wants to maximize its revenue and ensure that the production cost is as low as possible for the given quantity of land, cement and the available labor. In order to ensure that this is possible, the company must try to increase the upper L so that there would be an increase in MP (subscript upper C) and a decrease in MP (subscript upper L).
Answer:
Check the following explanation.
Explanation:
The goals of managers and shareholders are not always aligned. Agency theory suggests this misalignment creates the need for costly monitoring through compensation contracts.
To align the goals of the two parties,compensation contracts should be designed to motivate the executive to make decisions that will not only increase his or her wealth, but will also increase shareholder wealth. Steps taken to increase shareholder wealth should be reflected in improved firm performance.Including both components in the contracts helps ensure the decisions of the executive are linked to various time horizons.
Shortterm components motivate the executive to make decisions that have an immediate affect on the firm. Long-term components are necessary to lengthen the decision horizon of the executive and enhance the likelihood of continued improvement in firm value. The long-term incentives in these contracts can be based on improved shareholder wealth as well as improved firm performance.
