<span>Both industries need to become more customer-focused. Though their focus on profits is understandable, the decline in profits will continue if consumers see that the product they are receiving is lackluster. People drive or take buses or trains more often than they fly because flying has become so inconvenient and expensive. People hold on to cars well past their expiration dates because cars are so expensive and car salesmen are too pushy.</span>
Because the French nobility, king Louis XVI and the clergy had one major thing in common. All of them enjoyed and lived a lavish lifestyle full of riches, good food, and different luxuries that the average citizen in France could not even imagine perhaps. This is also the reason why they were criticized most.
Answer:It's B, C, and A
Explanation:Sharecropping sounded a lot better than it really was, it hurt the freed slaves more than helped them in the long run.
Answer No 1)
In the three colonial regions, education was similar in the respect that all the 3 colonial regions knew the worth of education. All the 3 colonial regions made it compulsory to acquire education. All the three colonial regions made sure that boys went to acquire knowledge and girls remained at home and taught basic knowledge in their homes.
Answer No 2)
New England Colonies: The New England colonies was build on the percepts of Bible. They thought education was necessary so that people could read the Scriptures. Basic education was given to children at homes and then the boys went to Latin Grammar School while the girls remained at home.
Middle Colonies: Education in Middle colonies was based on practical matters. These people knew the worth of education but left it on the family of the child to decide whether education be given or not. All boys earned a skill or trade.
Southern Colonies: In these colones, education was considered a must for the upper class. The children of upper class were taught at any cost. Slaves were not taken interest in for teaching.
Answer:
a
gradually became more liberal.
Explanation:
From 1985-2005, the Supreme Court became gradually more liberal before becoming more conservative for a time and then more liberal again. It is likely that with the addition of Gorsuch and Kavanaugh that the Court will shift Conservative again.
