1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
beks73 [17]
2 years ago
5

What is the determinant of the coefficient matrix of the system 9x+ Oy + 5z -

Mathematics
1 answer:
Oksanka [162]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A)0

just did test on edge

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
A super easy Math problem for 10 points...................
Oxana [17]

Answer:7.50

Step-by-step explanation: 3.00 + 0.50 times 9

7 0
3 years ago
Plzzz explain this question in detail​
Svet_ta [14]

Step-by-step explanation:

hi sis !! please ask me if u dont understand

6 0
3 years ago
How many 10-digit ternary strings are there that contain exactly two 0s, three 1s, and five 2s?
Svet_ta [14]

There are \dbinom{10}2 ways of picking 2 of the 10 available positions for a 0. 8 positions remain.

There are \dbinom83 ways of picking 3 of the 8 available positions for a 1. 5 positions remain, but we're filling all of them with 2s, and there's \dbinom55=1 way of doing that.

So we have

\dbinom{10}2\dbinom83\dbinom55=\dfrac{10!}{2!(10-2)!}\dfrac{8!}{3!(8-3)!}\dfrac{5!}{5!(5-5)!}=2520

The last expression has a more compact form in terms of the so-called multinomial coefficient,

\dbinom{10}{2,3,5}=\dfrac{10!}{2!3!5!}=2520

5 0
3 years ago
How can you use a compatible number to estimate a quotient when dividing a decimal by a whole number?
8090 [49]

Answer: just follow these simple steps!

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Estimate the quotient.

2. Perform the division. Remember to place a zero in the quotient when the divisor is larger than the dividend. ...

3. Compare your estimate with your quotient to verify that the answer makes sense.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
a study studied the birth weights of 1,999 babies born in the United States. The mean weight was 3234 grams with a standard devi
Aleks [24]

Answer:

1899

Step-by-step explanation:

The Empirical Rule states that, for a normally distributed random variable:

68% of the measures are within 1 standard deviation of the mean.

95% of the measures are within 2 standard deviation of the mean.

99.7% of the measures are within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

In this problem, we have that:

Mean = 3234

Standard deviation = 871

Percentage of newborns who weighed between 1492 grams and 4976 grams:

1492 = 3234 - 2*871

So 1492 is two standard deviations below the mean.

4976 = 3234 + 2*871

So 4976 is two standard deviations above the mean.

By the Empirical Rule, 95% of newborns weighed between 1492 grams and 4976 grams.

Out of 1999:

0.95*1999 = 1899

So the answer is 1899

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which function represents exponential decay?
    16·2 answers
  • Complete the statement using always, sometimes, or never. A rectangle is__________a square.
    14·2 answers
  • What is the 10th term of the geometric sequence 400, 200, 100...?
    5·1 answer
  • Lemme eat u ;) <br> not like that weirdo<br> love uuuu
    12·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP !!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    9·2 answers
  • Is -8.3 a rational number? if so can you provide it in a/b form
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Solve: 9^2x + 1 = 9^3x – 2
    10·2 answers
  • 5x - y = -3 in slope intercept form?
    10·2 answers
  • Pls help me
    15·1 answer
  • If f ( x ) = 2 x - 5, then f (4) is _____.<br><br> 3<br> 5<br> 4<br> 17
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!