Answer:
boron
Explanation:
boron has 5 protons and carbon has 6, so if carbon lost a proton, it would become boron since each element has a unique number of protons.
The statement “Only the “Conclusion” section discusses whether the original hypothesis was supported, and both sections suggest further research”, best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer: Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In research, we do experiments and derive the results. Then, those results were analyzed by us. In this analysis part, we compare our results with the related results published elsewhere. Also, we correlate the similarities and point out the differences between our analysis and other reported results.
In conclusion part, we have to check hypothesis or it supported. And, we summarise our analysis and figure out the further research need to be done on that to improvise our research. So, the final statement is the correct option which best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
A. 2-Fluoro-3-Chlorohexane
B. 1-Bromo-2-Chloro-3-Fluorocyclopentane
C. 4-ethyl-5-methylhexane
D. 2,4,5-trimethylheptane
This is because their tails are hydrophobic and their heads are hydrophilic. Hydrophobic meaning dislikes being near water and hydrophilic meaning likes to be near water. Therefore, they will orientate themselves in such a manner that the heads are facing externally and all the tails are facing together protected by the hydrophilic heads. google a photo of lipid chains in water if you are still confused. I'm not sure if that is what you are asking, but I hope it helps.
C) the scientist made an identification by identifying the amount of drug in her blood and realising it was high
