I would say C is the most correct.
In D it depends on what water source you're using. Let's say it is a waterfall, then the source of the water (melting ice or a lake) may disappear in the future.
If you're using underwater "windmills" placed in the ocean, then you would expect it to last a while as the ocean will not disappear in the near future.
Answer:
No, there is no evidence that the manufacturer has a problem with underfilled or overfilled bottles, due that according our results we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Explanation:
according to this exercise we have the following:
σ^2 =< 0.01 (null hypothesis)
σ^2 > 0.01 (alternative hypothesis)
To solve we can use the chi-square statistical test. To reject or not the hypothesis, we have that the rejection region X^2 > 30.14
Thus:
X^2 = ((n-1) * s^2)/σ^2 = ((20-1)*0.0153)/0.01 = 29.1
Since 29.1 < 30.14, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
It would be B.both solar thermal energy and solar electric energy.
