<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B9%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\sqrt[3]{9}" alt="\sqrt[3]{9}" align="absmiddle

A rectangle pool is 7 ft wide, it is 3 times as long as it is wide what’s the dimensions of the pool?

svetoff [14.1K]

The length is 3 times longer than the width (7)

3 x 7 = 21

the length is 21.

To find perimeter, add all sides together:

21 + 21 + 7 + 7 = 42 + 14 = 56

56 ft is your answer

hope this helps

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How much does 60% out of 100

Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: 60% out of 100

Expressed mathematically:

= (60/100) x 100

= 60

3 0

3 years ago

Lagrange multipliers have a definite meaning in load balancing for electric network problems. Consider the generators that can o

Ivahew [28]

Answer:

The load balance $(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(545.5,272.7,181.8)$ Mw minimizes the total cost

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Optimizing With Lagrange Multipliers</u>

When a multivariable function f is to be maximized or minimized, the Lagrange multipliers method is a pretty common and easy tool to apply when the restrictions are in the form of equalities.

Consider three generators that can output xi megawatts, with i ranging from 1 to 3. The set of unknown variables is x1, x2, x3.

The cost of each generator is given by the formula

$\displaystyle C_i=3x_i+\frac{i}{40}x_i^2$

It means the cost for each generator is expanded as

$\displaystyle C_1=3x_1+\frac{1}{40}x_1^2$

$\displaystyle C_2=3x_2+\frac{2}{40}x_2^2$

$\displaystyle C_3=3x_3+\frac{3}{40}x_3^2$

The total cost of production is

$\displaystyle C(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3x_1+\frac{1}{40}x_1^2+3x_2+\frac{2}{40}x_2^2+3x_3+\frac{3}{40}x_3^2$

Simplifying and rearranging, we have the objective function to minimize:

$\displaystyle C(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+\frac{1}{40}(x_1^2+2x_2^2+3x_3^2)$

The restriction can be modeled as a function g(x)=0:

$g: x_1+x_2+x_3=1000$

Or

$g(x_1,x_2,x_3)= x_1+x_2+x_3-1000$

We now construct the auxiliary function

$f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=C(x_1,x_2,x_3)-\lambda g(x_1,x_2,x_3)$

$\displaystyle f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+\frac{1}{40}(x_1^2+2x_2^2+3x_3^2)-\lambda (x_1+x_2+x_3-1000)$

We find all the partial derivatives of f and equate them to 0

$\displaystyle f_{x1}=3+\frac{2}{40}x_1-\lambda=0$

$\displaystyle f_{x2}=3+\frac{4}{40}x_2-\lambda=0$

$\displaystyle f_{x3}=3+\frac{6}{40}x_3-\lambda=0$

$f_\lambda=x_1+x_2+x_3-1000=0$

Solving for \lambda in the three first equations, we have

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{2}{40}x_1$

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{4}{40}x_2$

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{6}{40}x_3$

Equating them, we find:

$x_1=3x_3$

$\displaystyle x_2=\frac{3}{2}x_3$

Replacing into the restriction (or the fourth derivative)

$x_1+x_2+x_3-1000=0$

$\displaystyle 3x_3+\frac{3}{2}x_3+x_3-1000=0$

$\displaystyle \frac{11}{2}x_3=1000$

$x_3=181.8\ MW$

And also

$x_1=545.5\ MW$

$x_2=272.7\ MW$

The load balance $(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(545.5,272.7,181.8)$ Mw minimizes the total cost

5 0

3 years ago

Can someone pls help me with these I’ve asked this question 3 times already :( will mark brainiest

Tresset [83]

1: cell

2: distinction

3: assumption

4: foliage

5: commision

6: viewpoint

7: considerable

8: membrane

9: cell

10: final

11: viewpoint

12: considerable

uwu

Edit: added 9-12 didn't see them until I accidentally scrolled down, lol.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help Please. I'm no good when it comes to math

Natali [406]

Answer: question 5 is C

Question 4 is 37.68

Question 3 is 153.86 ft sq

The question about finding the area with a diameter of 16mm is 803.84

The next one is A. 25÷8

Step-by-step explanation:

C = 2 pi r

C = 2 pi (7.8) and you get 49.01

Becuse the question is asking to round c is the best choice

When using the formula of C = 2 pi r, since radius is half of the diameter, 12÷2=6

The formula for this one is A = pi r sq

You have the radius for this one is 7

Put 7 into that and you get. ~153.94

7 0

3 years ago