Select the correct answer.
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer:
Option D) F
Step-by-step explanation:
we have
-----> inequality A
The solution of the inequality A is the shaded area below the dashed line
The y-intercept of the dashed line is (0,10)
The x-intercept of the dashed line is (5,0)
----> inequality B
The solution of the inequality B is the shaded area below the dashed line
The y-intercept of the dashed line is (0,-2)
The x-intercept of the dashed line is (4,0)
The solution of the system of inequalities is the shaded area between the two dashed lines
see that attached figure
Remember that
If a ordered pair is a solution of the system of inequalities, then the ordered pair must lie on the shaded area of the solution
therefore
The solution are the points
E, F and G
