Answer:
The PFR is more efficient in the removal of the reactive compound as it has the higher conversion ratio.
Xₚբᵣ = 0.632
X꜀ₘբᵣ = 0.5
Xₚբᵣ > X꜀ₘբᵣ
Explanation:
From the reaction rate coefficient, it is evident the reaction is a first order reaction
Performance equation for a CMFR for a first order reaction is
kτ = (X)/(1 - X)
k = reaction rate constant = 0.05 /day
τ = Time constant or holding time = V/F₀
V = volume of reactor = 280 m³
F₀ = Flowrate into the reactor = 14 m³/day
X = conversion
k(V/F₀) = (X)/(1 - X)
0.05 × (280/14) = X/(1 - X)
1 = X/(1 - X)
X = 1 - X
2X = 1
X = 1/2 = 0.5
For the PFR
Performance equation for a first order reaction is given by
kτ = In [1/(1 - X)]
The parameters are the same as above,
0.05 × (280/14) = In (1/(1-X)
1 = In (1/(1-X))
e = 1/(1 - X)
2.718 = 1/(1 - X)
1 - X = 1/2.718
1 - X = 0.3679
X = 1 - 0.3679
X = 0.632
The PFR is evidently more efficient in the removal of the reactive compound as it has the higher conversion ratio.
Answer:
Yes. YES yes yes. Unless you are in Australia or something.
Hello there,
In the problems given in the question, the driver's license is confiscated and suspended.
So our answer is: A)
Achievements.
Answer:
B. G = 333 mS, B = j250 mS
Explanation:
impedance of a circuit element is Z = (3 + j4) Ω
The general equation for impedance
Z = (R + jX) Ω
where
R = resistance in ohm
X = reactance
R = 3Ω X = 4Ω
Conductance = 1/R while Susceptance = 1/X
Conductance = 1/3 = 0.333S
= 333 mS
Susceptance = 1/4 = 0.25S
= 250mS
The right option is B. G = 333 mS, B = j250 mS
Answer:
the pressure at a closed valve attached to the tank 10 ft above its bottom is 37.88 psi
Explanation:
Given that;
depth 1 = 71 ft
depth 2 = 10 ft
pressure p = 17 psi = 2448 lb/ft²
depth h = 71 ft - 10 ft = 61 ft
we know that;
p = P_air + yh
where y is the specific weight of ethyl alcohol ( 49.3 lb/ft³ )
so we substitute;
p = 2448 + ( 49.3 × 61 )
= 2448 + 3007.3
= 5455.3 lb/ft³
= 37.88 psi
Therefore, the pressure at a closed valve attached to the tank 10 ft above its bottom is 37.88 psi