Answer:
a) 244,140,625 different ways
b) 390,625 different ways
Explanation:
a) If there are 5 ways to place a chip on each location, and there are 12 locations overall, we have:
5^12 ways of placing them
This would mean a total of 244,140,625 different ways
b) If five chips are of the same type, we can first find how many ways we can place chips on the remaining 7 locations:
5^7 = 78,125
Next we can multiply this by the number of ways the next 5 chips could be the same:
78,125 * 5 = 390,625 different ways
Answer:


Explanation:
Given that:
x(t) = 10 sin(10t) . sin (15t)
the objective is to find the power and the rms value of the following signal square.
Recall that:
sin (A + B) + sin(A - B) = 2 sin A.cos B
x(t) = 10 sin(15t) . cos (10t)
x(t) = 5(2 sin (15t). cos (10t))
x(t) = 5 × ( sin (15t + 10t) + sin (15t-10t)
x(t) = 5sin(25 t) + 5 sin (5t)
From the knowledge of sinusoidial signal Asin (ωt), Power can be expressed as:

For the number of sinosoidial signals;
Power can be expressed as:

As such,
For x(t), Power 



For the number of sinosoidial signals;

For x(t), the RMS value is as follows:





Answer:
The note in this question is not an instrument that is negotiable under Article 3 of the U.C.C. Furthermore, it is not payable at any given time on demand due to the fact that principal repayment is not covered at a specified period of time. It shows that the acceleration clause is viable for the payment of the amount upon the default of the maker. This is also for an indefinite period of time.
Explanation:
The note in this question is not an instrument that is negotiable under Article 3 of the U.C.C. Furthermore, it is not payable at any given time on demand due to the fact that principal repayment is not covered at a specified period of time. It shows that the acceleration clause is viable for the payment of the amount upon the default of the maker. This is also for an indefinite period of time.
Answer:
Not subject to detection
Explanation:
Assuming the value of strain fracture toughness is 77 Mpa
The design stress is half hence
Critical flaw size,
Where Y is dimensionless parameter,
is applied stress,
is plane strain fracture toughness,
is critical length of surface crack
The critical length of surface crack is therefore 3.85 mm, which is less than detection apparatus size given as 4 mm
Since the critical flaw size is less than the resolution limit of flaw detection apparatus, the critical flaw for this plate is not subjected to detection.
Answer:
can you put it on english
Explanation: