Answer:
p-value: 1.000
There is enough evidence at the 1% level of significance to suggest that the proportions are not equal.
Step-by-step explanation:
We will be conducting a difference of 2 proportions hypothesis test
The hypothesis for this test is:
H_0: p1 - p2=0
H_a: p1 - p2 ≠0
(p1 ) = 252/300 = 0.84
(p2) = 195/300 = 0.65
This is a 2 tailed test with a significance level of 1%. So our critical values are: z > 2.575 and z < -2.575
See the attached photo for the calculations for this test
Answer:
The correct answer should be : Word parts
Step-by-step explanation:
Shown in the graph
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
Using graph tools we can graph the function:

which is the red graph shown below. As you can see, this is a parabola. The rule for vertical and horizontal shifts is as follows:


Therefore, If we shift the red graph 9 units to the right and 1 down, our new function (let's call it
) will be:

This graph is the blue graph below. Let's verify the transformation taking the vertex of the red graph:

By translating the 9 units to the right and 1 down the vertex is also translated by the same rule, so:

<h2>
Learn more:</h2>
Cubic function: brainly.com/question/13773618#
#LearnWithBrainly
Point slope formula y-y1=x(x-x1)
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.