Just put down no solution. It's unsolvable.
Answer: A
Step-by-step explanation:
The shape in the diagram is a square, a square is a shape with all sides being equal. To find out the length of all the sides, just count how many units make up one side since they're the same.
first you find the slope by making using the quation for slope
(7-3)/(0-5) and you find your slope is 4/-5. Then you can plug this into point slope form using on of the coordinates so:
y-y1=m(x-x1) --> y-3=-4/5(x-5)
then you distribute the -1 so -----> y-3=-4/5x+4 and then move the 3 over
so the answer is y= -4/5x+7
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
Answer:
im gay
Step-by-step explanation:
