Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.
Reactants on the left and products on the right
Answer:
Option b. 0.048 M
Explanation:
We have the molecular weight and the mass, from sulcralfate.
Let's convert the mass in g, to moles
1 g . 1 mol / 2087 g = 4.79×10⁻⁴ moles.
Molarity is mol /L
Let's convert the volume of solution in L
10 mL . 1L/1000 mL = 0.01 L
4.79×10⁻⁴ mol / 0.01 L = 0.048 mol/L
Two. The zero before the decimal is insignificant
