Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, a director of manufacturing must convince management that a proposed manufacturing method reduces costs before the new method can be implemented. The current production method operates with a mean cost of $220 per hour.
a) The alternative and null hypotheses would be:
H0: μ ≥ 220
Ha: μ < 220
b) Comment on the conclusion when H0 cannot be rejected:
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method cannot be implemented.
c) Comment on the conclusion when H0 can be rejected:
When the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method can be implemented.
Hello,
y+2=1/3*(x-1) ==>3y+6=x-1==>x-3y-7=0
Answer C
Answer:
15000+1250x
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the initial population is 15,000, we want to know how many people are going to Jonesville each year. Assuming that in 2001 and in 2002, each year adds 1,250 people and that it is constant. The equation is 15000+1250x in which 15,000 represents the initial number and 1250 is the amount of people added each year followed by x which is the number in years.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
(a) not proportional
(b) k = 7/8
Step-by-step explanation:
When a linear equation is of the form ...
y = mx + b
with b ≠ 0, the relation is NOT PROPORTIONAL.
__
If b=0, so the equation is of the form ...
y = kx
then the relation IS PROPORTIONAL. The constant of proportionality is k.
__
(a) Not proportional
(b) Proportional with k = 7/8
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the exponential decay function 
When 
then
so the initial amount is 
The exponential decay function 
has the decay factor 
In your case, the eexponential decay factor is 
