Answer:
Because of statements (a), (c) and (d).
Explanation:
Let's evaluate each statement to know why they focus on higher alcohols instead of ethanol:
(a) It is easier to produce higher alcohols in microbes than it is to produce ethanol<u>.</u> This is true<u> since ethanol is the major biofuel in the world because it can be easily produced by fermentation technology developed a long time ago. Recently, higher alcohols are produced from microorganisms that are used as microbial cell factories.</u>
(b) Higher alcohols have a higher hygroscopicity than ethanol. This is false since ethanol is more hygroscopic than higher alcohols.
(c) Higher alcohols have a lower vapor pressure than ethanol. This is true, ethanol has a higher vapor pressure than higher alcohols. The vapor pressure is important since it can affect the proper cold starting of the engine.
(d) Higher alcohols have a higher energy density than ethanol. This is true since the production of higher alcohols as biofuels is more desirable than the ethanol because higher alcohols have a high energy density and other more advantages than the use of ethanol.
Therefore the answer of why did they focus on higher alcohols to add to or substitute gasoline instead of ethanol is because of the statements (a), (c) and (d).
I hope it helps you!
0.0036g of NH4+ x 1mol of NH4+/18.04g of NH4+ x 6.02*10^23 electrons of NH4+/1mol of NH4+
= 1.20 x 10^20 electrons of NH4+
In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
If earth didn't rotate the global winds would stay on the same speed of rate because the wind isn't moving without rotation in the earths axis.
