Answer:

Explanation:
<u>Given:</u>
Number of atoms =
atoms
Avogadro's Number =
atom / mol
<u>Required:</u>
Moles = ?
<u>Formula:</u>

<u>Solution:</u>

no. of moles = 1.55 moles
![\rule[225]{225}{2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crule%5B225%5D%7B225%7D%7B2%7D)
Hope this helped!
<h3>~AH1807</h3>
A wet-chemistry biochemical analyzer<span> was assessed for in-practice veterinary use. Its small size may mean a cost-effective method for low-throughput in-house biochemical analyses for first-opinion practice. The objectives of our study were to determine imprecision, total observed error, and acceptability of the </span>analyzer<span> for measurement of common canine and feline </span>serum<span> analytes, and to compare clinical </span>sample<span> results to those from a commercial reference </span>analyzer<span>. Imprecision was determined by within- and between-run repeatability for canine and feline pooled </span>samples<span>, and manufacturer-supplied quality control material (QCM). Total observed error (TEobs) was determined for pooled </span>samples<span> and QCM. Performance was assessed for canine and feline pooled </span>samples<span> by sigma metric determination. Agreement and errors between the in-practice and reference </span>analyzers<span> were determined for canine and feline clinical </span>samples<span> by Bland-Altman and Deming regression analyses. Within- and between-run precision was high for most analytes, and TEobs(%) was mostly lower than total allowable error. Performance based on sigma metrics was good (σ > 4) for many analytes and marginal (σ > 3) for most of the remainder. Correlation between the </span>analyzers<span> was very high for most canine analytes and high for most feline analytes. Between-</span>analyzer<span> bias was generally attributed to high constant error. The in-practice </span>analyzer<span> showed good overall performance, with only calcium and phosphate analyses identified as significantly problematic. Agreement for most analytes was insufficient for transposition of reference intervals, and we recommend that in-practice-specific reference intervals be established in the laboratory.</span>
The descriptive term applied to the type of diene represented by 2,4-hexadiene is conjugated diene.
Dienes are compounds which contains two double bonds. These dienes can be non conjugated or conjugated.
Conjugated diene are those compound which have two double bonds joined by a single σ bond. Conjugated dienes can also be called 1,3-diene. To know if diene is conjugated or non conjugated, sp³ hybridization is to b checked and the number of double bonds and single sigma bond is checked.
Conjugated dienes are found in many different molecules. 2,4-hexadiene is a conjugated diene with two carbon-carbon double bonds that are separated by one sigma bond.
The stabilization of dienes by conjugation is better than the aromatic stabilization. Conjugated dienes are more stable than non conjugated or cumulative diene because it has higher electron density of molecules delocalized.
To learn more about conjugated dienes,
brainly.com/question/24261651
#SPJ4
Iron is the very last product in stellar fusion is that; Iron has a tightly bound nucleus, and atoms larger than iron are less stable and tend to undergo nuclear fission.
The stability of an atom is dependent on the binding energy per nucleon of the atom.
The binding energy per nucleon of elements increases steadily until iron, we can see that from the curve very easily.
Beyond iron, we have exceeded the region of stable binding energy per nucleon of atoms. The atoms after iron in the curve are mostly unstable heavy nuclei.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/10095561