Answer:
1. HBr>HCl> H2S >BH3
2.K_a1 very large — H2SO4
K_a1= 1.7 x 10^−2 — H2SO3
K_a1 = 1.7 x 10^−7 — H2S
Explanation:
As one goes down a row in the Periodic Table the properties that determine the acid strength can be observed.
The atoms get larger in radius meaning that in strength, the strength of the bonds get weaker, conversely meaning that the acids get stronger.
For the halogen-containing acids above following the rows and periods, HBr has the strongest bond and is the strongest acid and others follow in this order.
HBr>HCl> H2S >BH3
Acid Dissociation Constant provides us with information known as the ionization constant which comes in handy to measure the acid's strength. The meaning of the proportions are thus, the higher the Ka value, the stronger the acid i.e. it liberates more number of hydrogen ions per mole of acid in solution.
In solution strong acids completely dissociate hence, the value of dissociation constant of strong acids is very high.
Following the cues above on Ka;
K_a1 very large — H2SO4
K_a1= 1.7 x 10^−2 — H2SO3
K_a1 = 1.7 x 10^−7 — H2S
Answer:
You are looking for expected peaks in absorption spectra founded on structure of desired product, respectively on bound in desired compound. Every bond absorb specific energy from radiation which wavelength match to IR spectrum of light. Result of energy absorption is vibration of bond and bonded atoms (if they are not too heavy).That absorbed energy is seen as a peak in absorption spectra. These peaks are specific for each bound so you need to find peaks that mach to bounds in your desired compound and in that matter you can identify your compound.
In nuclear magnetic resonance you are looking for peaks specific for atoms in your desired compound (H or C atoms). When external magnetic field is applied, atom goes in higher energy state. When atoms goes "relaxing", it releasing energy that mach energy gap from relaxed end excited state. That energy is detected on nuclear magnetic resonance spectra and it depends on neighbor atom so you can determine the position of atoms and identify structure of desired compound.
For better results it is the best to combine these two methods.
Explanation:
Answer:
31.24 kJ
Explanation:
- SiO₂(g) + 3C(s) → SiC(s) + 2CO(g) ΔH° = 624.7 kJ/mol
First we <u>convert 3.00 grams of SiO₂ to moles</u>, using its <em>molar mass</em>:
- 3.00 g SiO₂ ÷ 60.08 g/mol = 0.05 mol
Now we <u>calculate the heat absorbed</u>, using the <em>given ΔH°</em>:
If the complete reaction of 1 mol of SiO₂ absorbs 624.7 kJ, then with 0.05 mol:
- 0.05 mol * 624.7 kJ/mol = 31.24 kJ of heat would be absorbed.
From what i read, the answer should be b--false
