Answer:
Explanation:
The variables we know and are given are:
time, t = 20s
Charge, Q = 3x1-^-6 electrons, which is just 3x10^-6C (C stands for Coulombs, which is the unit for Charge)
We need to find the current, I, and since we know Q and t we can substitute these values into the given equation:
I=Q/t (which if you look at what the RHS is saying, its Charge over time, or more literally means the amount of charge passing a point over a period of time)
If we substitute these values, we will get I as:
I = Q / t
I = 3x10^-6 / 20
I = 1.5x10^-7 A
Hope this helps!
Answer:
I think it is the last one.
Explanation:
I am not sure because i am stuck on this one, too.
B. is the answer.
C is not correct because the light is actually reflected off of an opaque object.
The original width was 94.71 cm
<span>The area decreased 33.1% </span>
<span>The equation for the final size is </span>
<span>2X^2 = 1.2 m^2 </span>
<span>X^2 - 0.6 m^2 </span>
<span>X^2 = 10000 * .6 cm </span>
<span>X = 77.46 cm (this is the width) </span>
<span>The length is 2 * 77.46 = 154.92 cm </span>
<span>The original length was 154.92 + 34.5 = 189.42 cm </span>
<span>The original width was 189.42 / 2 = 94.71 cm </span>
<span>The original area was 94.71 * 189.92 = 17939.9 cm^2 </span>
<span>The new area is 79.46 * 154.92 = 12000.1 cm^2 </span>
<span>The difference between the original and current area is 17939.9 - 12000.1 = 5939.86 cm^2 </span>
<span>The percentage the area decreased is 5939.86 ' 17939.9 = 33.1%</span>
Answer: I am pretty sure that you should pick radio waves.
Explanation: The scientist should use radio waves. I think this because you can use the radio waves to analyze the signals from outer space. This will work much better than anything there, to analyze it the best possible.
The best I could do.
