Answer:
the positive feedback's effect or responses are in the same direction as the initiating stimulus rather than opposite of it
Explanation:
Let's say that there a person in a team want to achieve a certain goal.
Positive feedback form team members will act as a stimulus that push that person into doing something that is aligned to the goal.
But,
When we give negative feedback under the same situation, it will cause a push back for that person that bring him/her further from the goals, so they tried harder in order to keep themselves further from the opposite directions from the goals.
<span>In accordance with his suggestion, Canning in 1827 introduced a measure on the corn laws proposing the adoption of a sliding scale to </span>regulate the amount of duty.<span>
</span>
There are several reasons why group problem-solving and decision making is more likely to produce the correct answer than in an individual setting.
One reason is that groups who act in a cooperative manner tend to do better than individuals, who are in a more competitive atmosphere. Group interaction facilitates collaboration, fresh ideas, and improved solutions.
Another reason why groups tend to do better is that a group has a better collective memory than one person does.
Lastly, a group working together can draw upon each other's strengths and talents, making the group more well-rounded and resource rich.
His panic disorder was apparently accompanied by "agoraphobia".
Agoraphobia refers to a kind of nervousness issue in which you fear and keep away from spots or circumstances that may make you frenzy and influence you to feel caught, powerless or humiliated. Individuals with agoraphobia frequently have indications of a fit of anxiety, for example, a quick pulse and queasiness, when they end up in an upsetting circumstance.
Answer:
Correlation and causation are two very different things
Explanation:
Correlation means that two or more factors are dependent on each other in a way that one can be predicted with the help of the other. On the other hand, causation means that one thing causes another. For instance, a correlation between ice cream consumption and hot weather means that when its hot people eat ice cream more and in less hot weather people eat less ice cream. But if this correlation is confused with causation between ice cream demand and hot weather then it would mean that eating ice cream causes hot weather which will not be correct. Also for causation, three criteria should be met which are correlation, no effect of third extraneous variable and this casual effect should precede all other rational effects.
