The Answer you are looking for is true
In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
116.3 grCO2
Explanation:
1st - we balance the equation so that it finds the same amount of elements of the product side and of the reagent side
C6H6 +15/2 O2⟶ 6CO2 +3 H2O
2nd - we calculate the limiting reagent
39.2gr C6H6*(240grO2/78grC6H6)=120 grO2
we don't have that amount of oxygen so this is the excess reagent and oxygen the limiting reagent
3rd - we use the limiting reagent to calculate the amount of CO2 in grams
105.7grO2*(264grCO2/240grO2)=116.3 grCO2
