All categories

3 years ago

Please help I am give brainiliest

Engineering

1 answer:

Tanzania [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

A. Original energy source is converted to AC power, then transported through conductors to your house.

Explanation:

The correct option is - A. Original energy source is converted to AC power, then transported through conductors to your house.

You might be interested in

Methane and oxygen react in the presence of a catalyst to form formaldehyde. In a parallel reaction, methane is oxidized to carb

Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

$y_{CH_4}^2=\frac{5mol/s}{100mol/s}=0.05\\y_{O_2}^2=\frac{3mol/s}{100mol/s}=0.03\\y_{H_2O}^2=\frac{47mol/s}{100mol/s}=0.47\\y_{HCHO}^2=\frac{43mol/s}{100mol/s}=0.43\\y_{CO_2}^2=\frac{2mol/s}{100mol/s}=0.02$

Explanation:

Hello,

a. On the attached document, you can see a brief scheme of the process. Thus, to know the degrees of freedom, we state the following unknowns:

- $\xi_1$ and $\xi_2$ : extent of the reactions (2).

- $F_{O_2}^2$ , $F_{CH_4}^2$ , $F_{H_2O}^2$ , $F_{HCHO}^2$ and $F_{CO_2}^2$ : Molar flows at the second stream (5).

On the other hand, we've got the following equations:

- $F_{O_2}^2=50mol/s-\xi_1-2\xi_2$ : oxygen mole balance.

- $F_{CH_4}^2=50mol/s-\xi_1-\xi_2$ : methane mole balance.

- $F_{H_2O}^2=\xi_1+2\xi_2$ : water mole balance.

- $F_{HCHO}^2=\xi_1$ : formaldehyde mole balance.

- $F_{CO_2}^2=\xi_2$ : carbon dioxide mole balance.

Thus, the degrees of freedom are:

$DF=7unknowns-5equations=2$

It means that we need two additional equations or data to solve the problem.

b. Here, the two missing data are given. For the fractional conversion of methane, we define:

$0.900=\frac{\xi_1+\xi_2}{50mol/s}$

And for the fractional yield of formaldehyde we can set it in terms of methane as the reagents are equimolar:

$0.860=\frac{F_{HCHO}^2}{50mol/s}$

In such a way, one realizes that the output formaldehyde's molar flow is:

$F_{HCHO}^2=0.860*50mol/s=43mol/s$

Which is equal to the first reaction extent $\xi_1$ , therefore, one computes the second one from the fractional conversion of methane as:

$\xi_2=0.900*50mol/s-\xi_1\\\xi_2=0.900*50mol/s-43mol/s\\\xi_2=2mol/s$

Now, one computes the rest of the output flows via:

- $F_{O_2}^2=50mol/s-43mol/s-2*2mol/s=3mol/s$

- $F_{CH_4}^2=50mol/s-43mol/s-2mol/s=5mol/s$

- $F_{H_2O}^2=43mol/s+2*2mol/s=47mol/s$

- $F_{HCHO}^2=43mol/s$

- $F_{CO_2}^2=2mol/s$

The total output molar flow is:

$F_{O_2}+F_{CH_4}+F_{H_2O}+F_{HCHO}+F_{CO_2}=100mol/s$

Therefore the output stream composition turns out into:

Best regards.

7 0

3 years ago

A fluid of specific gravity 0.96 flows steadily in a long, vertical 0.71-in.-diameter pipe with an average velocity of 0.90 ft/s

KengaRu [80]

Answer:

0.00650 Ib s /ft^2

Explanation:

diameter ( D ) = 0.71 inches = 0.0591 ft

velocity = 0.90 ft/s ( V )

fluid specific gravity = 0.96 (62.4 ) ( x )

change in pressure ( P ) = 0 because pressure was constant

viscosity = (change in p - X sin∅ ) $D^{2}$ / 32 V

= ( 0 - 0.96( 62.4) sin -90 ) * 0.0591 ^2 / 32 * 0.90

= - 59.904 sin (-90) * 0.0035 / 28.8

= 0.1874 / 28.8

viscosity = 0.00650 Ib s /ft^2

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A satellite would have a mass of 270 kg on the surface of Mars. Determine the weight of the satellite in pounds if it is in orbi

koban [17]

Answer:

26 lbf

Explanation:

The mass of the satellite is the same regardless of where it is.

The weight however, depends on the acceleration of gravity.

The universal gravitation equation:

g = G * M / d^2

Where

G: universal gravitation constant (6.67*10^-11 m^3/(kg*s))

M: mass of the body causing the gravitational field (mass of Earth = 6*10^24 kg)

d: distance to that body

15000 miles = 24140 km

The distance is to the center of Earth.

Earth radius = 6371 km

Then:

d = 24140 + 6371 = 30511 km

g = 6.67*10^-11 * 6*10^24 / 30511000^2 = 0.43 m/s^2

Then we calculate the weight:

w = m * a

w = 270 * 0.43 = 116 N

116 N is 26 lbf

8 0

3 years ago

The chart shows the bids provided by four engineers to test a prototype.

klasskru [66]

Answer:

Explanation:

To know which is most or least cost-effective, it's not enough to look at only the per day rate, or only the time to complete. You have to multiply them to get the total cost of the project.

$\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}&Cost\ per\ day\ (\$)&Time\ to\ complete\ (days)&Total\ cost\ (\$)\\Zoe&500&8&4000\\Greg&650&10&6500\\Orion&400&12&4800\\Jin&700&5&3500\end{array}\right]$

As you can see, Greg is the least cost-effective because he charges the most for the project.

8 0

3 years ago

Consider a modification of the air-standard Otto cycle in which the isentropic compression and expansion processes are each repl

Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

The answers to the question are

(1) Process 1 to 2

W = 295.16 kJ/kg

Q = -73.79 kJ/kg

(2) Process 2 to 3

W = 0

Q = 1135.376 kJ/kg

(3) Process 3 to 4

W = -1049.835 kJ/kg

Q = 262.459 kJ/kg

(4) Process 4 to 3

W=0

Q = -569.09 kJ/kg

(b) The thermal efficiency = 49.9 %

Explanation:

(a) Volume compression ratio $\frac{v_1}{v_2} = 10$

Initial pressure p₁ = 1 bar

Initial temperature, T₁ = 310 K

cp = 1.005 kJ/kg⋅K

Temperature T₃ = 2200 K from the isentropic chart of the Otto cycle

For a polytropic process we have

$\frac{p_1}{p_2} = (\frac{v_2}{v_1} )^n$ Therefore p₂ = p₁ ÷ $(\frac{v_2}{v_1} )^n$ = (1 bar) ÷ $(\frac{1}{10} )^{1.3}$ = 19.953 bar

Similarly for a polytropic process we have

$\frac{T_1}{T_2} = (\frac{v_2}{v_1} )^{n-1}$ or T₂ = T₁ ÷ $(\frac{v_2}{v_1} )^{n-1}$ = $\frac{310}{0.1^{0.3}}$ = 618.531 K

The molar mass of air is 28.9628 g/mol.

Therefore R = $\frac{8.3145}{28.9628}$ = 0.287 kJ/kg⋅K

cp = 1.005 kJ/kg⋅K Therefore cv = cp - R = 1.005- 0.287 = 0.718 kJ/kg⋅K

1). For process 1 to 2 which is polytropic process we have

W = $\frac{R(T_2-T_1)}{n-1}$ = $\frac{0.287(618.531-310)}{1.3 - 1}$ = 295.16 kJ/kg

Q = $(\frac{n-\gamma}{\gamma - 1} )W$ = $(\frac{1.3-1.4}{1.4-1} ) 295.16 kJ/kg$ = -73.79 kJ/kg

W = 295.16 kJ/kg

Q = -73.79 kJ/kg

2). For process 2 to 3 which is reversible constant volume heating we have

W = 0 and Q = cv×(T₃ - T₂) = 0.718× (2200-618.531) = 1135.376 kJ/kg

W = 0

Q = 1135.376 kJ/kg

3). For process 3 to 4 which is polytropic process we have

W = $\frac{R(T_4-T_3)}{n-1}$ = Where T₄ is given by $\frac{T_4}{T_3} = (\frac{v_3}{v_4} )^{n-1}$ or T₄ = T₃ × $0.1^{0.3}$

= 2200 × $0.1^{0.3}$ T₄ = 1102.611 K

W = $\frac{0.287(1102.611-2200)}{1.3 - 1}$ = -1049.835 kJ/kg

and Q = 262.459 kJ/kg

W = -1049.835 kJ/kg

Q = 262.459 kJ/kg

4). For process 4 to 1 which is reversible constant volume cooling we have

W = 0 and Q = cv×(T₁ - T₄) = 0.718×(310 - 1102.611) = -569.09 kJ/kg

W=0

Q = -569.09 kJ/kg

(b) The thermal efficiency is given by

$\eta = 1-\frac{T_4-T_1}{T_3-T_2}$ = $1-\frac{1102.611-310}{2200-618.531}$ = 0.499 or 49.9 % Efficient

$p_{m} = \frac{p_1r[(r^{n-1}-1)(r_p-1)]}{ (n-1)(r-1)}$ where r = compression ratio and $r_p$ = $\frac{p_3}{p_2}$

However p₃ = $\frac{p_2T_3}{T_2}$ = $\frac{(19.953)(2200)}{618.531}$ =70.97 atm

$r_p$ = $\frac{p_3}{p_2}$ = $\frac{70.97}{19.953} = 3.56$

Therefore $p_m =\frac{1*10*[(10^{0.3}-1)(3.56-1)]}{0.3*9}$ = 9.44 bar

Please find attached generalized diagrams of the Otto cycle

8 0

3 years ago