1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sattari [20]
3 years ago
6

Help please .....

Physics
2 answers:
olga2289 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Pick something up with your hand and drop it. When you release it from your hand, its speed is zero. On the way down its speed increases. The longer it falls the faster it travels. Sounds like acceleration to me.

But acceleration is more than just increasing speed. Pick up this same object and toss it vertically into the air. On the way up its speed will decrease until it stops and reverses direction. Decreasing speed is also considered acceleration.

But acceleration is more than just changing speed. Pick up your battered object and launch it one last time. This time throw it horizontally and notice how its horizontal velocity gradually becomes more and more vertical. Since acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with time and velocity is a vector quantity, this change in direction is also considered acceleration.

In each of these examples the acceleration was the result of gravity. Your object was accelerating because gravity was pulling it down. Even the object tossed straight up is falling — and it begins falling the minute it leaves your hand. If it wasn't, it would have continued moving away from you in a straight line. This is the acceleration due to gravity.

In this initial experiment the bowling ball drops straight to the ground whereas the feathers float, owing to air resistance.

He alludes to the earlier experiment by Galileo that tested the same hypothesis.

"Galileo’s experiment was simple," he explains. "He took a heavy object, and a light one, and dropped them at the same time to see which fell fastest."

Although Galileo’s experiment proved two similarly shaped objects would fall at the same speed despite being different weights, he didn’t have access to a vacuum chamber in the 17th Century to conduct Professor Cox's more extravagant experiment.

Professor Cox also used the bowling ball and feather to prove a hypothesis put forward by Albert Einstein.

His Special Theory of Relativity argued that items would not be falling but standing still due to lack of force acting on them.

"Isaac Newton would say that the ball and the feather fall because there’s a force pulling them down: gravity,’ Professor Cox said.

"But Einstein imagined the scene very differently.

"The “happiest thought of his life” [as Einstein called it] was this; the reason the bowling ball and the feather fall together is because they’re not falling.

"They’re standing still. There is no force acting on them at all.

"He reasoned that if you couldn’t see the background, there’d be no way of knowing that the ball and the feathers were being accelerated towards the Earth.

"So he concluded they weren’t."

The tweaking of Newton’s earlier theory enabled Einstein to more accurately define his own theory, which regards the relationship between space and time.

Explanation:

ella [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Pick something up with your hand and drop it. When you release it from your hand, its speed is zero. On the way down its speed increases. The longer it falls the faster it travels. Sounds like acceleration to me.

But acceleration is more than just increasing speed. Pick up this same object and toss it vertically into the air. On the way up its speed will decrease until it stops and reverses direction. Decreasing speed is also considered acceleration.

But acceleration is more than just changing speed. Pick up your battered object and launch it one last time. This time throw it horizontally and notice how its horizontal velocity gradually becomes more and more vertical. Since acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with time and velocity is a vector quantity, this change in direction is also considered acceleration.

In each of these examples the acceleration was the result of gravity. Your object was accelerating because gravity was pulling it down. Even the object tossed straight up is falling — and it begins falling the minute it leaves your hand. If it wasn't, it would have continued moving away from you in a straight line. This is the acceleration due to gravity.

In this initial experiment the bowling ball drops straight to the ground whereas the feathers float, owing to air resistance.

He alludes to the earlier experiment by Galileo that tested the same hypothesis.

"Galileo’s experiment was simple," he explains. "He took a heavy object, and a light one, and dropped them at the same time to see which fell fastest."

Although Galileo’s experiment proved two similarly shaped objects would fall at the same speed despite being different weights, he didn’t have access to a vacuum chamber in the 17th Century to conduct Professor Cox's more extravagant experiment.

Professor Cox also used the bowling ball and feather to prove a hypothesis put forward by Albert Einstein.

His Special Theory of Relativity argued that items would not be falling but standing still due to lack of force acting on them.

"Isaac Newton would say that the ball and the feather fall because there’s a force pulling them down: gravity,’ Professor Cox said.

"But Einstein imagined the scene very differently.

"The “happiest thought of his life” [as Einstein called it] was this; the reason the bowling ball and the feather fall together is because they’re not falling.

"They’re standing still. There is no force acting on them at all.

"He reasoned that if you couldn’t see the background, there’d be no way of knowing that the ball and the feathers were being accelerated towards the Earth.

"So he concluded they weren’t."

The tweaking of Newton’s earlier theory enabled Einstein to more accurately define his own theory, which regards the relationship between space and time.

hope it helps you

You might be interested in
Which of these scenarios in a ripple tank would result in destructive interference?
Nimfa-mama [501]
I think it's B. two troughs meeting.

if it's wrong just let me know and I'll figure out the right answer
hope my answer helps!!!!!!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is 1.986 x 10 6 in standard notation
natima [27]
1.986\cdot 10^6=1986000
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help<br><br><br>Pls for me
Viefleur [7K]
İşin zor kardeşim allah kolaylık versin. Çok çalış
8 0
3 years ago
In which case would a widely accepted scientific idea most likely be revised?
Anna11 [10]
When evidence is found that challenges, disproves or contradicts the idea.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the correct calculation for voltage if the resistance is 3 ohms and the current is 4 amps?
denis23 [38]

Answer:

iek

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which quantity can be calculated using the equation E = mc2?
    10·1 answer
  • cheAt an amusement park, a swimmer uses a water slide to enter the main pool. If the swimmer starts at rest, slides without fric
    10·1 answer
  • An ideal monatomic gas expands isobarically, doubling the volume, from a state A to state B. It is then compressed isothermally
    10·1 answer
  • What is a Hyper nova
    10·1 answer
  • What do scientist do to receive suggestions an criticism of their research from other scientists?
    12·2 answers
  • A spacecraft is travelling in space with no resultant force and no resultant moment acting on it​
    15·1 answer
  • What is si unit?mention any give phisical quantities with their si unit.​
    8·1 answer
  • A cyclist is riding his bike up a mountain trail. When he starts up the trail, he is going 8 m/s. As the trail gets steeper, he
    12·1 answer
  • She walks 50 yards north 20 yards east 50 yards south what is total displacement
    7·1 answer
  • What is electronic logic​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!