1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sattari [20]
3 years ago
6

Help please .....

Physics
2 answers:
olga2289 [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Pick something up with your hand and drop it. When you release it from your hand, its speed is zero. On the way down its speed increases. The longer it falls the faster it travels. Sounds like acceleration to me.

But acceleration is more than just increasing speed. Pick up this same object and toss it vertically into the air. On the way up its speed will decrease until it stops and reverses direction. Decreasing speed is also considered acceleration.

But acceleration is more than just changing speed. Pick up your battered object and launch it one last time. This time throw it horizontally and notice how its horizontal velocity gradually becomes more and more vertical. Since acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with time and velocity is a vector quantity, this change in direction is also considered acceleration.

In each of these examples the acceleration was the result of gravity. Your object was accelerating because gravity was pulling it down. Even the object tossed straight up is falling — and it begins falling the minute it leaves your hand. If it wasn't, it would have continued moving away from you in a straight line. This is the acceleration due to gravity.

In this initial experiment the bowling ball drops straight to the ground whereas the feathers float, owing to air resistance.

He alludes to the earlier experiment by Galileo that tested the same hypothesis.

"Galileo’s experiment was simple," he explains. "He took a heavy object, and a light one, and dropped them at the same time to see which fell fastest."

Although Galileo’s experiment proved two similarly shaped objects would fall at the same speed despite being different weights, he didn’t have access to a vacuum chamber in the 17th Century to conduct Professor Cox's more extravagant experiment.

Professor Cox also used the bowling ball and feather to prove a hypothesis put forward by Albert Einstein.

His Special Theory of Relativity argued that items would not be falling but standing still due to lack of force acting on them.

"Isaac Newton would say that the ball and the feather fall because there’s a force pulling them down: gravity,’ Professor Cox said.

"But Einstein imagined the scene very differently.

"The “happiest thought of his life” [as Einstein called it] was this; the reason the bowling ball and the feather fall together is because they’re not falling.

"They’re standing still. There is no force acting on them at all.

"He reasoned that if you couldn’t see the background, there’d be no way of knowing that the ball and the feathers were being accelerated towards the Earth.

"So he concluded they weren’t."

The tweaking of Newton’s earlier theory enabled Einstein to more accurately define his own theory, which regards the relationship between space and time.

Explanation:

ella [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Pick something up with your hand and drop it. When you release it from your hand, its speed is zero. On the way down its speed increases. The longer it falls the faster it travels. Sounds like acceleration to me.

But acceleration is more than just increasing speed. Pick up this same object and toss it vertically into the air. On the way up its speed will decrease until it stops and reverses direction. Decreasing speed is also considered acceleration.

But acceleration is more than just changing speed. Pick up your battered object and launch it one last time. This time throw it horizontally and notice how its horizontal velocity gradually becomes more and more vertical. Since acceleration is the rate of change of velocity with time and velocity is a vector quantity, this change in direction is also considered acceleration.

In each of these examples the acceleration was the result of gravity. Your object was accelerating because gravity was pulling it down. Even the object tossed straight up is falling — and it begins falling the minute it leaves your hand. If it wasn't, it would have continued moving away from you in a straight line. This is the acceleration due to gravity.

In this initial experiment the bowling ball drops straight to the ground whereas the feathers float, owing to air resistance.

He alludes to the earlier experiment by Galileo that tested the same hypothesis.

"Galileo’s experiment was simple," he explains. "He took a heavy object, and a light one, and dropped them at the same time to see which fell fastest."

Although Galileo’s experiment proved two similarly shaped objects would fall at the same speed despite being different weights, he didn’t have access to a vacuum chamber in the 17th Century to conduct Professor Cox's more extravagant experiment.

Professor Cox also used the bowling ball and feather to prove a hypothesis put forward by Albert Einstein.

His Special Theory of Relativity argued that items would not be falling but standing still due to lack of force acting on them.

"Isaac Newton would say that the ball and the feather fall because there’s a force pulling them down: gravity,’ Professor Cox said.

"But Einstein imagined the scene very differently.

"The “happiest thought of his life” [as Einstein called it] was this; the reason the bowling ball and the feather fall together is because they’re not falling.

"They’re standing still. There is no force acting on them at all.

"He reasoned that if you couldn’t see the background, there’d be no way of knowing that the ball and the feathers were being accelerated towards the Earth.

"So he concluded they weren’t."

The tweaking of Newton’s earlier theory enabled Einstein to more accurately define his own theory, which regards the relationship between space and time.

hope it helps you

You might be interested in
Help me plzzz<br>And thank u​
GuDViN [60]

Answer:

$ 1.1

Explanation:

From the question given above, the following data were obtained:

Cost per kWh = $ 0.1

Current (I) = 10 A

Voltage (V) = 220 V

Time (t) = 5 h

Cost of operation =?

Next, we shall determine the power the electric oven. This can be obtained as follow:

Current (I) = 10 A

Voltage = 220 V

Power (P) =?

P = IV

P = 10 × 220

P = 2200 W

Next, we shall convert 2200 W to KW. This can be obtained as follow:

1000 W = 1 KW

Therefore,

2200 W = 2200 W × 1 KW / 1000 W

2200 W = 2.2 KW

Thus, 2200 W is equivalent to 2.2 KW.

Next, we shall determine the energy consumed by the electric oven. This can be obtained as follow:

Power (P) = 2.2 KW

Time (t) = 5 h

Energy (E) =?

E = Pt

E = 2.2 × 5

E = 11 KWh

Finally, we shall determine the cost of operation. This can be obtained as follow:

1 KWh cost $ 0.1

Therefore,

11 KWh will cost = 11 × 0.1

11 KWh will cost = $ 1.1

Therefore, the cost of operating the electric oven is $ 1.1

5 0
2 years ago
An airplane with constant speed 696 mph than another 40 minutes constant speed 804 mph what is distance it go?
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

536 miles

Explanation:

If the airplane is running at a speed of 804 miles per hour, and covers a distance, x in a particular number of mile. The distance in mile can be gotten they the application of direct formula. Multiplying the speed by the time it took, and thus

804 mph * 40

Remember the time is in minutes and not hours, so, you convert it to hours.

804 * 40/60 hours =

536 miles

6 0
3 years ago
How was our galaxy formed?
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

according to big bang theory our galaxy was formed 13billion years ago and then made the stars and galaxies we see today. ... The universe began as a very hot, small, and dense superforce (the mix of the four fundamental forces), with no stars, atoms, form, or structure (called a "singularity).

8 0
2 years ago
Mass and weight are the same in<br> meaning and unit.<br><br> true or false
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

Mass is how much space an object takes up, while weight is how light or heavy an object is.

4 0
2 years ago
How is the polarization of an electromagnetic wave defined? Group of answer choices The polarization is defined by the plane in
Anarel [89]

Answer:

The polarization is defined by the plane in which the electric field is oscillating.

Explanation:

The polarization of an electromagnetic wave depends on the direction of the electric field. If the electric component is oscillating along the x-axis, the polarization will also be along the x-axis.

The polarization of the electromagnetic wave describes the magnitude and the direction of the electric field of the wave.

<u>The polarization is defined by the plane in which the electric field is oscillating.</u>

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How rolling friction is less than sliding friction?
    14·1 answer
  • A 2,100 kg car is lifted by a pulley. If the cable breaks at 4.50 m, what is the velocity of the car when it hits the ground
    9·1 answer
  • An oceanic depth-sounding vessel surveys the ocean bottom with ultrasonic waves that travel 1530 m/s in seawater. How deep is th
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an ionic compound ? A. Gold
    13·1 answer
  • At what efficiency is a photovoltaic array running if insolation on the collector is 650 W/m2, the total collector area is 10 m2
    15·1 answer
  • Crest to crest or trough to trough
    15·1 answer
  • Magnesium Oxide Reaction
    9·2 answers
  • A 150 g sample of brass at 100 °C is placed in a Styrofoam cup of water containing 120 mL of water at 10 °C. No heat is lost to
    7·1 answer
  • General kinematics problem.
    5·1 answer
  • Ultraviolet light from a distant star is traveling at 3.0 × 108 m/s. how long will it take for the light to reach earth if it mu
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!