All categories

3 years ago

6. 498.82 mg comverted to kg

Physics

2 answers:

Ivanshal [37]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

0.00049882 kg

........................

saul85 [17]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

498.82 mg=0.00049882 kg

Explanation:

To get this answer, you must multiply the quantity of mg by 0.000001, which is also 0.001². Since one gram is 1000 mg, and 1000 g is 1 kg, you must divide the amount of mg by one million, or multiply by 1/1000000, or 0.000001. I hope this helped you. Enjoy your day, and take care!

You might be interested in

The diffraction limit is a limit on: The diffraction limit is a limit on: A telescope's size. A telescope's angular resolution.

Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

A telescope's angular resolution.

Explanation:

Diffraction limit is a minimum angular separation of two sources and it can be distinguished by the telescope. This angle is known as the diffraction limit. It is proportional to the wavelength of light and it has an inverse relation with the diameter of the telescope. Mathematically it is defined as

θ = 1.22λ/d

where θ is the angle, λ wavelength and d is the diameter of the objective mirror (lenz).

7 0

3 years ago

the idling engines of a landing turbojet produce forward thrust when operating in a normal manner, but they can produce reverse

Finger [1]

Forward thrust has positive values and reverse thrust has negative values.

Thrust is a sudden push or pull in a certain direction.

Flight speed u = 150 km/h

1 km/h = $\frac{1}{3.6}$ km/s

therefore, 150 km/h = 41.67 km / s

The thrust force represents the horizontal or x-component of momentum equation:

$T = m_{exhaust} * U_{exhaust} - U_{flight}$

T = 50 * (150 - 41.67)

T = 5416.67 N

Therefore, the value of forward thrust is 5416.67 N.

Now the exhaust velocity is now vertical due to reverse thrust application, then it has a zero horizontal component,

thus thrust equation is:

$T = m_{exhaust} * U_{exhaust} - U_{flight}$

T = 50 * (0 - 41.67)

T = -2083.5 N

Therefore, the thrust force T is -2083.5 N in the reverse direction.

Now the exhaust velocity and flight velocity is zero, then it has a zero horizontal component, thus thrust is also zero because $U_{exhaust} = U_{flight} = 0\\$

T = 0

Therefore, there is no difference in two velocities in x direction.

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is,

"The idling engines of a landing turbojet produce forward thrust when operating in a normal manner, but they can produce reverse thrust if the jet is properly deflected. Suppose that while the aircraft rolls down the runway at 150 km/h the idling engine consumes air at 50 kg/s and produces an exhaust velocity of 150 m/s.

a. What is the forward thrust of this engine?

b. What are the magnitude and direction (i.e., forward or reverse) if the exhaust is deflected 90 degree without affecting the mass flow?

c. What are the magnitude and direction of the thrust (forward or reverse) after the plane has come to a stop, with 90 degree exhaust deflection and an airflow of 40 kg/s?"

To know more about thrust,

brainly.com/question/14552836

#SPJ1

3 0

1 year ago

FREE BRAINIEST IF YOU ANSWER THIS

Inessa [10]

The watt is a rate, similar to something like speed (miles per hour) and other time-interval related measurements.

Specifically, watt means Joules per Second. We are given that the electrical engine has 400 watts, meaning it can make 400 joules per second. If we need 300 kJ, or 3000 Joules, then we can write an equation to solve the time it would take to reach this amount of joules:

w * t = E

w: Watts

t: Time

E: Energy required

(Watts times time is equal to the energy required)

Input our values:

400 * t = 3000

(We need to write 3000 joules instead of 300 kilojoules, since Watts is in joules per second. It's important to make sure your units are consistent in your equations)

Divide both sides by 400 to isolate t:

$\frac{400t}{400}$ = $\frac{3000}{400}$

t = 7.5 (s)

It will take 7.5 seconds for the 400 W engine to produce 300 kJ of work.

If you have any questions on how I got to the answer, just ask!

- breezyツ

6 0

3 years ago

A material made of _____ would be a very good conductor of energy.

aliya0001 [1]

Metal is a good conductor of energy

5 0

3 years ago

What is the difference between charging by contact and charging by induction in terms of electron transfer.

Veronika [31]

Answer:

the main difference between charging by contact and charging by induction is that in the first case, the two objects are touching, while in the second case, the two objects do not touch

Explanation:

There are three methods of charging an object:

- Charging by friction: this is done by rubbing an object against another object. An example is when a plastic rod is rubbed with a wool cloth. When this is done, electrons are transferred from the wool to the rod, so both objects remain charged at the end of the process

- Charging by contact: this is done by putting in contact a charged object with a neutral, conducting object. In this case, the charges are transferred from the charged object to the neutral object; at the end of the process, the neutral object will also have a net electric charge, so it will be also charged.

- Charging by induction: in this case, we take a charged object, and a neutral object, and we place the two objects close to each other, but without touching. Let's assume that the charged object is negatively charged: in this case, the positive charges in the neutral object are attracted towards the negative charges of the charged object, while the negative charges of the neutral object are repelled away. As a result, the positive and negative charges in the neutral object split apart. If the object is connected to the ground, then negative charges move away, so the neutral object will remain positively charged.

Therefore, the main difference between charging by contact and charging by induction is that in the first case, the two objects are touching, while in the second case, the two objects do not touch.

5 0

3 years ago

6. 498.82 mg comverted to kg​

6. 498.82 mg comverted to kg