<span>they both had their conclusions based on solid evidence</span>
Actually, we can answer the problem even without the first statement. All we have to do is write the reaction for the production of sulfur trioxide.
2 S + 3 O₂ → 2 SO₃
The stoichiometric calculations is as follows:
7 g S * 1 mol/32.06 g S = 0.218 mol S
Moles O₂ needed = 0.218 mol S * 3 mol O₂/2 mol S = 0.3275 mol O₂
Since the molar mas of O₂ is 32 g/mol,
Mass of O₂ needed = 0.3275 mol O₂ * 32 g/mol = 10.48 g O₂
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Here is an example: Hubble Space Telescope's launch in 1990 sped humanity to one of its greatest advances in that journey. Hubble is a telescope that orbits Earth. Its position above the atmosphere, which distorts and blocks the light that reaches our planet, gives it a view of the universe that typically far surpasses that of ground-based telescopes.
Hubble is one of NASA's most successful and long-lasting science missions. It has beamed hundreds of thousands of images back to Earth, shedding light on many of the great mysteries of astronomy. Its gaze has helped determine the age of the universe, the identity of quasars, and the existence of dark energy.
Answer:
A. There is more dissolved oxygen in colder waters than in warm water.
D. If ocean temperature rise, then the risk to the fish population increases.
Explanation:
Conclusion that can be drawn from the two facts stated above:
*Dissolved oxygen is essential nutrient for fish survival in their aquatic habitat.
*Dissolved oxygen would decrease as the temperature of aquatic habit rises, and vice versa.
*Fishes, therefore, would thrive best in colder waters than warmer waters.
The following are scenarios that can be explained by the facts given and conclusions arrived:
A. There is more dissolved oxygen in colder waters than in warm water (solubility of gases decreases with increase in temperature)
D. If ocean temperature rise, then the risk to the fish population increases (fishes will thrive best in colder waters where dissolved oxygen is readily available).
