1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Korvikt [17]
2 years ago
9

You heat two substances, A and B. Both substances change color. When cooled, substance A returns to its original color, but subs

tance B does not. What most likely happened in this situation? A chemical change occurred in both substances. A physical change occurred in substance A, and a chemical change occurred in substance B. A physical change occurred in both substances. A chemical change occurred in substance A, and a physical change occurred in substance B.
Chemistry
1 answer:
ryzh [129]2 years ago
8 0

The reason why A returned to its original color but B did not is because; A  chemical change occurred in substance A, and a physical change occurred in substance B.

A chemical change results in a change in the "composition" of a substance. When the composition of the substance changes, the change is often irreversible.

A physical change does not alter the composition of a substance hence a physical change is easily reversible.

Since A did not return to its former color, it underwent a chemical change while B underwent a physical change since it returned to its former color.

Learn more: brainly.com/question/6284546

You might be interested in
I NEED HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
pav-90 [236]

Answer:

4

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At room temperature iodine is a solid and bromine is a liquid.
vichka [17]

Answer:

<u>Kinetic particle theory</u>

Arrangement and motion of solid particles

-> Solid particles are packed closely with each other in an orderly manner. They vibrate vigorously in their fixed positions.

Arrangement and motion of liquid particles

-> Liquid particles are packed less closely with each other as compared to solid particles in a disorderly manner. They move around in a random motion; sliding past each other.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT true regarding Rutherford's Gold Foil experiment?
erastova [34]

Answer:

The area around the nucleus must be of low mass.

Explanation:

Rutherford`s experiment showed that there are some positive charges in the center of the atoms, and because they are all together, they will give a great mass to the atom.

It was quite different from Thomson`s experiment, in which it was thought that the negative charges were mixed with the positive charges, around the atom (like a Pudding Model). In Rutherford`s experiment, because the direction of beta particles, it was the prediction of the positive nucleus.

Hope this info is useful.

8 0
3 years ago
The Nutrition Facts label for crackers states that one serving contains 19 g of carbohydrate, 4 g of fat, and 2 g of protein. Wh
sp2606 [1]

<u>Answer:</u> The amount of kilocalories contained in the given serving of crackes is 0.120 kCal

<u>Explanation:</u>

<u>As per the USDA:</u>

Carbohydrates provide 4 calories per gram, protein provides 4 calories per gram, and fat provides 9 calories per gram

We are given:

Mass of fat in the crackers = 4 g

Mass of carbohydrates in the crackers = 19 g

Mass of protein in the crackers = 2 g

Conversion factor used:  1 kCal = 1000 Cal

Applying unitary method:

  • <u>For Fat:</u>

1 gram of fat provides 9 calories

So, 4 gram of fat will provide = \frac{9}{1}\times 4=36Cal=0.036kCal

  • <u>For Carbohydrates:</u>

1 gram of carbohydrates provides 4 calories

So, 19 gram of carbohydrates will provide = \frac{4}{1}\times 19=76Cal=0.076kCal

  • <u>For Proteins:</u>

1 gram of proteins provides 4 calories

So, 2 gram of fat will provide = \frac{4}{1}\times 2=8Cal=0.008kCal

Total kilocalories per serving = [0.036 + 0.076 + 0.008] kCal = 0.120 kCal

Hence, the amount of kilocalories contained in the given serving of crackes is 0.120 kCal

8 0
3 years ago
How many molecules are there in 24 grams of FeF(3)?
Burka [1]

The SAME number of molecules are in ANY “mole” of a compound or element. So, you only need to ... 24 g116 g/mol=0.207 moles of FeF3.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many grams are there in 7.3 moles of NH3?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of organelles are most important in providing a cell with energy
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these objects will most likely float? A. An object whose volume is greater than its mass B. A cruise ship that weighs 5
    9·2 answers
  • What is the total number of elements in group 17 that are gases at room temperature and standard pressure?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these has the greatest compressibility?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these elements has four total electrons in its outer p orbitals?
    6·2 answers
  • When an electron jumps from a high energy state to a lower state, what form does the emitted energy take?
    7·2 answers
  • Which has a greater momentum, a car or a bike moving at the same speed​
    8·1 answer
  • What is produced each time a c-c bond is re-arranged or broken?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about maintaining a fitness program is ture?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!