Answer:
40 + x is correct!
Step-by-step explanation:
I think its the... second.... please correct me if im wrong :(
Okay, so total dogs are 49.
So we know if x=large dogs and y=small dogs, then x+y=49.
Next we are told that there are 36 MORE small dogs than large dogs. We can take that more meaning addition, and x being our value for large dogs. So y=x+36.
After that we now know what value we can plug in for y. So x+x+36=49.
We can then simplify it to 2x+36=49.
Subtracting the 36 from both sides, leaves you with 2x=13.
Followed by dividing both sides by 2, gives you x=6.5. Or 6.5 large dogs.
Now we can plug this into our formula for the small dogs (y=x+36) to give us y=6.5+36, which simplifies to y=42.5. Or 42.5 small dogs. Which is our answer.
We can double check it by adding the small and large dogs together, 6.5+42.5, which gives us 49, our total entries.
Answer:
thats great =)
Step-by-step explanation: can i pls have brainliest pls im on one more
Answer:
The data provide sufficient evidence that older people are more likely to be victimized.
Step-by-step explanation:
H 0 : P = 0.10
H 1 : P > 0.10 (Right tailed test)
n = 527, P = 0.1235
The test statistics
x = P - p / 
x = 0.1235 - 0.10 / 
x = 0.0235 / 
x = 0.0235 / 
x = 0.0235 / 0.0130682049264618
x = 1.798257689731729
x = 1.798
P value = [1 - p(Z > 1.7980] (Right tailed test)
P value = 0.036089
The P - Value is very small, so <u>reject H0</u>
Conclusion: The data provide sufficient evidence that older people are more likely to be victimized.
