Answer:
m=2 and n=3
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step</u> :-
Given ![[ 2 x^{n}y^{2} ]^m = 4 x^6 y^4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%202%20x%5E%7Bn%7Dy%5E%7B2%7D%20%5D%5Em%20%3D%204%20x%5E6%20y%5E4)
using algebraic formula 
now

now equating 'x' powers, we get

....(1)
now

Equating 'y' powers ,we get
2 m=4
m=2
substitute m= 2 in equation (1)
we get
2 n=6
n=3
verification:-
substitute m=2 and n=3 , we get
![[ 2 x^{n}y^{2} ]^m = 4 x^6 y^4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%202%20x%5E%7Bn%7Dy%5E%7B2%7D%20%5D%5Em%20%3D%204%20x%5E6%20y%5E4)


both are equating so m= 2 and n=3
If Paul mows the lawn once, he earns 1*25.50. If he mows it twice, he earns 2*25.50, and so on. So, he earns L*25.50. But, he spends 3.50. So the equation is:
Answer:
(5,354 + x)
or
536.4*x
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that x = 10.
Now we want to write an expression (in terms of x) for the number 5,364.
This could be really trivial, remember that x = 10.
Then: (x - 10) = 0
And if we add zero to a number, the result is the same number, then if we add this to 5,364 the number does not change.
5,364 = 5,364 + (x - 10) = 5,364 + x - 10
5,364 = 5,354 + x
So (5,354 + x) is a expression for the number 5,364 in terms of x.
Of course, this is a really simple example, we could do a more complex case if we know that:
x/10 = 1
And the product between any real number and 1 is the same number.
Then:
(5,364)*(x/10) = 5,364
(5,364/10)*x = 5,364
536.4*x = 5,364
So we just found another expression for the number 5,364 in terms of x.
To solve first move the 98 to the other side by subtracting it from both sides. Then divide by - 1 on both sides to that the x^2 is no longer a negative. You are left with:

Now square root both sides to get

The two factors that make up 98 are 49 and 2. 49 can be square rooted. So we are left with these answers:

and
Answer:
Option D
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following equations -

It would be best to solve this equation in matrix form. Write down the coefficients of each terms, and reduce to " row echelon form " -
First, I swapped the first and third rows.
Leading coefficient of row 2 canceled.
The start value of row 3 was canceled.
Matrix rows 2 and 3 were swapped.
Leading coefficient in row 3 was canceled.

And at this point, I came to the conclusion that this system of equations had no solutions, considering it reduced to this -

The positioning of the zeros indicated that there was no solution!
<u><em>Hope that helps!</em></u>