Answer:
elements are composed of
electrons with a little mass and negative charge
protons with mass and positive charge
neutrons with mass and no charge
isotopes same number of protons, different in neutrons
share me the other part of the photo to complete!!!
Answer:
None are empirical formulas
Explanation:
All are actual compounds. An example of an empirical formula could be CH2O, the empirical formula for carbohydrates like glucose (C6H12O6).
Cellular respiration releases stored energy and glucose molecules and converts it into a form of energy that can be used by cells
Empirical formula is calculated as follows
calculate the moles of each element, that is % composition/ molar mass
molar masses ( Si= 28.09g/mol , Cl= 35.5 g/mol, I=126.9 g/mol)
moles of silicon = 7.962/28.09g/mol= 0.283 moles
moles of chlorine = 20.10 / 35.5g/mol = 0.566 moles
moles of iodine= 71.94 / 126.9 g/mol= 0.567 moles
divide each mole with smallest mole (0.283)
that is silicon = 0.283/0.283= 1 mole
chlorine = 0.566/0.283= 2 mole
Iodine= o.567/0.283= 2 moles
empirical formula is therefore= SiCl2I2
Answer:
The different structures are shown in the attachment.
I and II - structural isomers
I and III - Structural isomers
I and IV - structural isomers
II and III - structural isomers
II and IV - structural isomers
III and IV - stereoisomers
Explanation:
The knowledge of Isomerism is tested here; there are two types of isomerism ; structural and stereoisomerism.
- Structural Isomers have similar molecular and different double bond positioning, these occurs mostly in ALKENE FAMILY.
- Stereo-isomers have the same molecular formular and similar patterns but differ in their spatial arrangement. trans and cis are typical examples of stereo-isomers.
From the question; Relationship between I and II is that they are structural isomers since they have the same molecular formula, but different bond atom arrangement and infact they are the same compound.
- Relationship between I and III is that they are structural isomers with similar molecular formular but differ in the double bond position.
- Relationship between I and IV is that they are structural isomers with similar molecular formula but different double bond arrangement.
- Relationship between II and III is that they are structural isomers with similar molecular formular but different double bond position
- Relationship between II and IV is that they are also structural isomers with the same molecular formular but different double bond position.
- Relationship between III and IV is that they are stereo-isomers with same molecular formula but different spatial arrangement, hence cis and trans.