<span>A. Comparison
</span>What type of organization is used in a paragraph that lists similarities between two objects? Comparison
NOT:
<span>B. Contrast
C. Chronological order
D. Cause and effect</span><span>
</span>
The radial velocity method preferentially detects large planets close to the central star
- what is the Radial velocity:
The radial velocity technique is able to detect planets around low-mass stars, such as M-type (red dwarf) stars.
This is due to the fact that low mass stars are more affected by the gravitational tug of planets.
When a planet orbits around a star, the star wobbles a little.
From this, we can determine the mass of the planet and its distance from the star.
hence we can say that,
option D is correct.
The radial velocity method preferentially detects large planets close to the central star
Learn more about radial velocity here:
<u>brainly.com/question/13117597</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
A new substance was formed
Explanation:
According to this question, a shiny and flexible metal called Magnesium (Mg) is burnt in air to produce a white powder that has no shiny or flexible properties, however, has more weight than the magnesium metal itself.
This is possible because a CHEMICAL CHANGE has occured, hence, a new substance has been formed. The formation of a new substance during the burning process (chemical reaction), induced the increase in mass.
Answer:
2.23 × 10^6 g of F- must be added to the cylindrical reservoir in order to obtain a drinking water with a concentration of 0.8ppm of F-
Explanation:
Here are the steps of how to arrive at the answer:
The volume of a cylinder = ((pi)D²/4) × H
Where D = diameter of the cylindrical reservoir = 2.02 × 10^2m
H = Height of the reservoir = 87.32m
Therefore volume of cylindrical reservoir = (3.142×202²/4)m² × 87.32m = 2798740.647m³
1ppm = 1g/m³
0.8ppm = 0.8 × 1g/m³
= 0.8g/m³
Therefore to obtain drinking water of concentration 0.8g/m³ in a reservoir of volume 2798740.647m³, F- of mass = 0.8g/m³ × 2798740.647m³ = 2.23 × 10^6 g must be added to the tank.
Thank you for reading.
Answer:
No. Neither the USGS nor any other scientists have ever predicted a major earthquake. We do not know how, and we do not expect to know how any time in the foreseeable future.
