1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergeinik [125]
3 years ago
6

Imagine Joe calls the police from his smart phone to report a crime he could see from his house. While he’s on the phone with th

e dispatcher, he seems suspicious, leaving out certain details and refusing to give any information about himself or how to contact him. However, the 911 dispatcher can track his phone’s location automatically, and the police arrived at his door without a warrant. They just plan to talk to him, and try to persuade him to give more information on his own.
Joe has already locked his front door and fled the scene, specifically to avoid speaking with the officers. However, the artificial intelligence that controls Joe’s smart house knows Joe recently called 911, and it is programmed to assist emergency responders in case the residents of the house need to be rescued. So, when the police arrive at his door to take his statement, the A.I. opens the door to let them inside. Once the door opens, the police see drugs, drug paraphernalia, and guns.

Given that the police did not have a search warrant, and Joe did not open the door, will those items be admissible as evidence? Explain your reasoning.

How should smart homes be programmed to respond to these types of situations? Should safety or privacy be more important?

As advanced technology becomes more and more common, what procedures might police need to develop for interacting with smart homes?
Law
1 answer:
Mazyrski [523]3 years ago
3 0

If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.

And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.

You might be interested in
A person commits an offense if the person drives a vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.
Orlov [11]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Differential opportunity theory argues that we all have the same opportunity to commit crimes, indicating that it is something a
gavmur [86]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Jamie Lee and Ross are now having the attorney draw up a will for each of them. What is the purpose of having a will
DENIUS [597]

Answer:

the purpose of a will is so you can give you recent belongings and money to you family and friends.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Which images show parents who are likely to have an adverse affect on their child’s development?
diamong [38]

Answer:

Dominating parent and Parent who is a victim of abuse

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hello! Please click on the link and get me to 99% please!
matrenka [14]

Answer:

cool

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the worst thing one person can do in order to get the longest sentence in prison?
    8·2 answers
  • What is an example of globalization?​
    11·2 answers
  • I need to write an apology cuz i prank called a pizza place to my friends house and they told my parents i was wondering if this
    12·2 answers
  • Woonzie ufhuglhurlghuqcfhnughioa rniohunffioufreyguneghergvenoanvhuariovhuniesobgunvioerahnovuerio
    14·1 answer
  • I want to be a lawyer:) does anybody have like tips or whatever im only in 8th grade but i want to be prepared lol
    6·1 answer
  • Bago tayo maniwala sa balita o palatastas dapat ay palaging may ?<br> clue: HANDBEAS
    5·1 answer
  • Only answer if you feel like you know it
    10·1 answer
  • Does it make sense to you to allow an employee to bring a sexual harassment cause of action if the employee suffered no adverse
    15·1 answer
  • Oh, so your a lawyer? name every law
    8·1 answer
  • Research a criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining, and explain the facts of the case. Weighing the evidence and
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!