Complete Question
The diagram for this question is shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
a E =data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44b0f/44b0f4da3952ced18df4360ed7af51f16670d63d" alt="1.685*10^3 N/C"
b E =data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc6d8/dc6d8ebe9483103e071b7970bb9a1b7aab6327d4" alt="36.69*10^3 N/C"
c E = 0 N/C
d data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34e1e/34e1e9e4c66292e19bef4bfd56f63e0d372b376d" alt="V = 6.7*10^3 V"
e data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb8e4/fb8e4b2587ac83b79022f3c8a8fe21c4da14418d" alt="V = 26.79*10^3V"
f V = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a828/2a828fa63c541506f595509a370881ecdf8ed8d8" alt="34.67 *10^3 V"
g data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32719/327194b6388d15403c1d2fa4b3674b882b943f54" alt="V= 44.95*10^3 V"
h data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32719/327194b6388d15403c1d2fa4b3674b882b943f54" alt="V= 44.95*10^3 V"
i data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32719/327194b6388d15403c1d2fa4b3674b882b943f54" alt="V= 44.95*10^3 V"
Explanation:
From the question we are given that
The first charge data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ffbd/4ffbd25e02527bf88492506390a52b17ddbcf6c9" alt="q_1 = 2.00 \mu C = 2.00*10^{-6} C"
The second charge data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b85f7/b85f7fd06743a0fd3f3858e88cb8e06c5b0f3512" alt="q_2 =1.00 \muC = 1.00*10^{-6}"
The first radius data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/905bf/905bfffc7dd88aa77a0bec6d4f4c7354d7b2d9f7" alt="R_1 = 0.500m"
The second radius data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c07d/9c07de32a9514975e8c59e2f15f05a4311ab3d0a" alt="R_2 = 1.00m"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44586/44586ba9cea4ac22e92631fe8f789878f51fa884" alt="Generally \ Electric \ field = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_1+\ q_2}{r^2}"
And ![Potential \ Difference = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1 }{r}+\frac{q_2}{R_2} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Potential%20%5C%20Difference%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%20%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%20%7D%7Br%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%5D)
The objective is to obtain the the magnitude of electric for different cases
And the potential difference for other cases
Considering a
r = 4.00 m
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e51e/1e51ebb0db28eaf32038c191cb38de18d44478af" alt="E = \frac{((2+1)*10^{-6})*8.99*10^9}{16}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1de1b/1de1bb032733bed2e9aec50fa18a4979b6bb2efa" alt="= 1.685*10^3 N/C"
Considering b
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c383/7c383c57927e4f156e140e4a9be4e7ea48675779" alt="r = 0.700 m \ , R_2 > r > R_1"
This implies that the electric field would be
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/583ee/583ee926e24ae8e8338bf599d4ba6d94878f6b7c" alt="E = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{q_1}{r^2}"
This because it the electric filed of the charge which is below it in distance that it would feel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a01a/6a01a4d3f8c92d093daa4d78feadeb6d88cdbadf" alt="E = 8*99*10^9 \frac{2*10^{-6}}{0.4900}"
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc6d8/dc6d8ebe9483103e071b7970bb9a1b7aab6327d4" alt="36.69*10^3 N/C"
Considering c
r = 0.200 m
=> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14f81/14f815bad993a3b3f751ffcf900536aa8742dd3d" alt="r"
The electric field = 0
This is because the both charge are above it in terms of distance so it wont feel the effect of their electric field
Considering d
r = 4.00 m
=> data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9736c/9736c272399c80900a0ad77f9d6bf0de0d0b283c" alt="r > R_1 >r>R_2"
Now the potential difference is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59117/591171b8c71e2b2a48bf483bfc3d873eab959353" alt="V =\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 + \ q_2}{r} = 8.99*10^9 * \frac{3*10^{-6}}{4} = 6.7*10^3 V"
This so because the distance between the charge we are considering is further than the two charges given
Considering e
r = 1.00 m data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbd02/fbd0293c81787f6b2ede5bdd99f1ecd67645ffe5" alt="R_2 = r > R_1"
![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} \frac{1.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 26.79 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2026.79%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering f
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c383/7c383c57927e4f156e140e4a9be4e7ea48675779" alt="r = 0.700 m \ , R_2 > r > R_1"
![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.700} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 34.67 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.700%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2034.67%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering g
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686ec/686ec1df8ce2d38991a53bf7800454e336c402d4" alt="r =0.500\m , R_1 >r =R_1"
![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7Br%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering h
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7389d/7389dea11782fae005ba77293632008a32c403be" alt="r =0.200\m , R_1 >R_1>r"
![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7BR_1%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Considering i
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46f46/46f46233f0c5346deada5d0559fefbd08233ca13" alt="r =0\ m \ , R_1 >R_1>r"
![V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B4%5Cpi%20%5Cepsilon_0%7D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bq_1%7D%7BR_1%7D%20%2B%5Cfrac%7Bq_2%7D%7BR_2%7D%20%20%5D%20%3D%208.99%2A10%5E9%20%2A%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B2.00%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B0.500%7D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.0%2A10%5E%7B-6%7D%7D%7B1.00%7D%20%5D%20%3D%2044.95%20%2A10%5E3%20V)
Given that Oxygen has an oxidation state of 2 -, you can combine Mn 3+ with O 2- ions to form Mn2O3, and you can combine Mn 2+ with O 2- to form Mn2O2 which is MnO.
The other compounds imply oxidation states of N, Br and Cl that does not exist.
Therefore, the answer is the option D. MnO
Answer:
They both rises to same height.
Explanation:
When an object is sliding up in friction less surface than according to conservation of energy its potential energy will be converted into kinetic energy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eac5/1eac52964a94b32b2939a977aa59c2e6c336800d" alt="mgH=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}\\ v=\sqrt{2gH}"
Here, m is the mass, v is the velocity, g is the acceleration due to gravity and H is the height.
Here the height is independent on the mass of an object and its only depend on velocity.
Now according to the question, two objects have same velocity but they have different masses.
Therefore, they rises to the same height because height will not change with mass.
Don’t trust those links they usually pull up your IP