The equivalent capacitance (
) of an electrical circuit containing four capacitors which are connected in parallel is equal to: A. 21 F.
<h3>The types of circuit.</h3>
Basically, the components of an electrical circuit can be connected or arranged in two forms and these are;
<h3>What is a parallel circuit?</h3>
A parallel circuit can be defined as an electrical circuit with the same potential difference (voltage) across its terminals. This ultimately implies that, the equivalent capacitance (
) of two (2) capacitors which are connected in parallel is equal to the sum of the individual (each) capacitances.
Mathematically, the equivalent capacitance (
) of an electrical circuit containing four capacitors which are connected in parallel is given by this formula:
Ceq = C₁ + C₂ + C₃ + C₄
Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;
Ceq = 10 F + 3 F + 7 F + 1 F
Equivalent capacitance, Ceq = 21 F.
Read more equivalent capacitance here: brainly.com/question/27548736
#SPJ1
voltage across 2.0μf capacitor is 5.32v
Given:
C1=2.0μf
C2=4.0μf
since two capacitors are in series there equivalent capacitance will be
[tex] \frac{1}{c} = \frac{1}{c1} + \frac{1}{c2} [/tex]


=1.33μf
As the capacitance of a capacitor is equal to the ratio of the stored charge to the potential difference across its plates, giving: C = Q/V, thus V = Q/C as Q is constant across all series connected capacitors, therefore the individual voltage drops across each capacitor is determined by its its capacitance value.
Q=CV
given,V=8v


charge on 2.0μf capacitor is


=5.32v
learn more about series capacitance from here: brainly.com/question/28166078
#SPJ4
Answer
given,
mass of copper rod = 1 kg
horizontal rails = 1 m
Current (I) = 50 A
coefficient of static friction = 0.6
magnetic force acting on a current carrying wire is
F = B i L
Rod is not necessarily vertical


the normal reaction N = mg-F y
static friction f = μ_s (mg-F y )
horizontal acceleration is zero


B_w = B sinθ
B_d = B cosθ
iLB cosθ= μ_s (mg- iLB sinθ)





B = 0.1 T
The statement: "secondary evidence is the basis for drawing scientific conclusions" is definitely false. Secondary evidence is the body of information obtained to prove the existence of unknown or missing primary evidence. In drawing scientific conclusions, primary evidence is needed.