1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mario62 [17]
2 years ago
10

Which substance would evaporate the fastest at room temperature? (Assume each substance has approximately the same molecular

Chemistry
1 answer:
lutik1710 [3]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A non-polar liquid.

Explanation:

Whether a substance dissolves quickly or not depends on how strongly the molecules (or atoms of an element) of a substance are attracted to one another. These interactions between atoms and/or molecules are called intermolecular forces, or IMFs for short. There are several different ones, and these are distinguished from <em>intra</em>molecular forces which are the bonds holding atoms in the molecule together. Attached is a nice little summary of these forces to consider. Our decision lies within the fact that we must pick the substance that experiences the strongest IMF (the one with the most energy). As it turns out, a dipole in a molecule confers some charge distribution on the molecule which makes slightly positive and negative ends. These can attract each other, and it's called dipole-dipole interactions. It can technically happen in a mixture, but let's assume we're dealing with pure substances. Dipoles can only form in polar compounds however, so a non-polar liquid (which is composed of non-polar molecules), will lack these dipoles and therefore cannot form dipole-dipole interactions between the molecules. This results in only having something called dispersion forces (which really every molecule attraction has - so this is the only one). It is very weak, and since the attraction between these molecules is weak, they will tend to come apart, and evaporate. You can think of the IMFs like glue, and a weak glue will not hold the molecules together well, and they will evaporate away.

On the other hand, polar (from dipole interactions) compounds can have general dipole-dipole interactions or hydrogen-bonding interactions (which is a special type of dipole-dipole interaction). H-bonding requires a Hydrogen bonded to either a Nitrogen, Oxygen, or Fluorine to do this. The main thing, is the non-polar ones don't have a dipole, and so they can't form a good intermolecular bond and evaporate quickly.

Water can H-bond, which is why it takes so long to dry and for it to evaporate in general. Nail polish, which is really a solution of acetone, has considerably weaker dipole-dipole bonds (compared to H-bonds), and evaporates quicker than water. Hope this helps!

Note: Figure taken from Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change 8th edition.

You might be interested in
Look at the diagram. De both lemas and humans have the traits listed at point D? Explain your reasoning​
Bogdan [553]

Answer:

WHAT DIAGRAM THX FOR POINTS THO

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
7.) Regarding molecular formula and empirical formula for a particular compound... (A) the subscripts in the empirical formula m
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

i think the anwer would be that its elliptical orbit and the tilt an its axis.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
......................................
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

Explanation:

yes leon is correct because matter is anything that takes space and also has mass in it.

thks.

5 0
3 years ago
Give the formula for the alkane containing 500 carbons.
Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

1002

Explanation:

C_{2n}H_{2n+2}

500 multiply by 2 add 2

5 0
3 years ago
Many classic experiments have given us indirect evidence of the nature of the atom. Which of the experiments below did not give
taurus [48]

The Rutherford experiment proved the Thomson “plum-pudding” model of the atom to be essentially correct did not give the results described and is denoted as option A.

<h3>What is Thomson “plum-pudding” model?</h3>

This model was proposed by J.J Thomson in which referred an atom as a sphere of positive charge, and negatively charged electrons are embedded in it to balance the total positive charge.

This model was incorrect and the Rutherford atomic model was adopted in which he described the electrons orbits about a tiny positive nucleus.

The nucleus contains protons and neutrons instead thereby making it the correct choice.

Read more about Atom here brainly.com/question/6258301

#SPJ1

The options include the following:

a.The Rutherford experiment proved the Thomson “plum-pudding” model of the atom to be essentially correct.

b.The Rutherford experiment was useful in determining the nuclear charge on the atom.

c.Milikan’s oil-drop experiment showed that the charge on any particle was a simple multiple of the charge on the electron.

d.The electric discharge tube proved that electrons have a negative charge

4 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • What property can be used to tell the difference between two minerals, if they have the same hardness?
    10·1 answer
  • Ethan is investigating a snails response to stimuli. He put the following substances on each corner of a paper towel; syrup,lemo
    5·2 answers
  • Please help!!
    8·1 answer
  • Pure water is an electrolytic solution. <br><br><br> True <br> False
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the larger atom S or Mg
    13·1 answer
  • Which elements are necessary to accomplish work?
    6·2 answers
  • Chemistry help!<br><br><br><br><br>Zoom in to see better!! ​
    7·1 answer
  • What is a non example of tendon?
    10·1 answer
  • 6. Which change to a population would cause
    9·1 answer
  • Why do we feel cold when we touch the iron?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!