Answer:
The weight of the girl = 1045.86 kg/m³
Explanation:
Density: This can be defined as the ratio of the mass of a body to the volume of that body. The S.I unit of density is kg/m³.
From Archimedes principle,
R.d = Density of the person/Density of water = Weight of the person in air/Upthrust.
⇒ D₁/D₂ = W/U............................... Equation 1.
Where D₁ = Density of the person, D₂ = Density of water, W = Weight of the person in air, U = Upthrust in water.
Making D₁ the subject of the equation,
D₁ = D₂(W/U)................................... Equation 2
<em>Given: D₂ = 1000 kg/m³ , W = 509.45 N, U = lost in weight = weight in air - weight in water = 509.45 - 22.34 = 487.11 N</em>
<em>Substituting these values into equation 2</em>
D₁ = 1000(509.45/487.11)
D₁ = 1045.86 kg/m³
Thus the weight of the girl = 1045.86 kg/m³
<em></em>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Wetlands: These are areas or placed where water covers the soil or the area or is present either at or near the surface of the soil all year or for varying periods of time during the year,it may also include the growing season.
Answer:
-0.9 m/s²
Explanation:
Given:
Δx = 500 m
v₀ = 50 m/s
v = 40 m/s
Find: a
v² = v₀² + 2aΔx
(40 m/s)² = (50 m/s)² + 2a (500 m)
a = -0.9 m/s²
Explanation:
They probably put "rolls without slipping" in there to indicate that there is no loss in friction; or that the friction is constant throughout the movement of the disk. So it's more of a contingency part of the explanation of the problem.
(Remember how earlier on in Physics lessons, we see "ignore friction" written into problems; it just removes the "What about [ ]?" question for anyone who might ask.)
In this case, you can't ignore friction because the disk wouldn't roll without it.
As far as friction producing a torque... I would say that friction is a result of the torque in this case. And because the point of contact is, presumably, the ground, the friction is tangential to the disk. Meaning the friction is linear and has no angular component.
(You could probably argue that by Newton's 3rd Law there should be some opposing torque, but I think that's outside of the scope of this problem.)
Hopefully this helps clear up the misunderstanding for you.
