Always remember that a compound can be separated into simpler substances by chemical methods/reactions. While elements cannot be broken down into simpler substances by chemical reactions. You can do a flame test and spectrum analysis to determine whether a solid material is an element or a compound. Check the boiling and/or melting point, color or density. Also check the solid material’s reaction with oxygen, hydrogen, calcium, or various acids. Examine and study its physical chemistry. The element(s) that may be present may be identified by checking the absorption edges from an x-ray spectrum.
For instance, a solid white material (A) is heated in the absence of air, decomposing to form a new white material (B) and gas (C). Gas (C) has the same properties as the products when carbon is burned in an excess of oxygen (CO2). How can we determine whether A, B, and C are elements or compounds? A would be a compound since it was broken down into B and C. So how do we determine B and C?
A compound can be decomposed, for the reason that a compound is composed of 2 or more elements. On the contrary, an element cannot be decomposed.
The reaction formula of this is NaCl + AgNO3 = NaNO3 + AgCl. The mole number of NaCl is 4/58.5=0.068 mol. The mole number of AgNO3 is 10/170=0.059 mol. So the NaCl is excess.
Answer:the energy required by an atom to lose or gain electron (e-) to be able to form ions.either cation or anion.
Explanation:
to lose or gain e- an atom has to donate or receive e- to to this it requires the more easily it can lose an electron the more electro positive it is and the more easily it gains electron the more electro negative it is.
Answer:
Three orbitals
Explanation:
The electronic configuration of carbon is given as follows;
1s²2s²2p²
Therefore, out of the six electrons of the carbon atoms, 4 fill the 1s and 2s orbitals with 2 electrons each, while the two remaining electrons are situated in the 2p orbital, with the electrons in the 2p orbital will remain unpaired such that they will have similar quantum numbers in accordance with Pauli exclusion principle.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
There are only 2 ways to explain this.
distance
and brightness caused by what it is burning.
A is true but it is not the explanation of why it is true.
B this is actually not true. Other stars would burn much more.
C It is not the largest star. In fact it is in the lower middle.
D is the answer. 93 million miles as these things go, is not every much.
