Answer:
6.35 centimeters
Explanation:
<em>2.5 inches</em> = <em>6.35 centimeters</em>
Formula:
- <em>multiply </em><em>the value in </em><em>inche</em><em>s by the </em><em>conversion</em><em> factor '</em><em>2.54'.</em>
So, 2.5 inches = 2.5 × 2.54 = 6.35 centimeters.
Answer:
Clavulanic acid has two (2) chiral centers.
Explanation:
A chiral center is a center (usually carbon) with four different substituents.
The structure of clavulanic acid is shown in the attachment below.
Consider the labeled diagram in the attachment,
Carbon A is not a chiral carbon because it has two hydrogen atoms attached to it
Carbon B is not a chiral carbon because it has only three substituents
Carbon C is a chiral carbon because it has four different substituents
Carbon D is a chiral carbon because it has four different substituents
Carbon E is not a chiral carbon because it has only three atoms directly attached to it
Carbon F is not a chiral carbon because it has only three atoms directly attached to it
Carbon G is not a chiral carbon because it has two hydrogen atoms attached to it
Carbon H is not a chiral carbon because it has only three substituents
Then, only carbons C and D are chiral carbons.
Hence, clavulanic acid have two (2) chiral centers.
Answer:
C6H12O6 —> 2C2H5OH + 2CO2
Explanation:
The equation for the reaction is given below:
C6H12O6 —> C2H5OH + CO2
We can balance the equation above as follow:
There are 12 atoms of H on the left side and 6 atoms of the right side. It can be balance by putting 2 in front of C2H5OH as shown below:
C6H12O6 —> 2C2H5OH + CO2
There are 6 atoms of C on the left side and 5 atoms on the right side. It can be balance by putting 2 in front of CO2 as shown below:
C6H12O6 —> 2C2H5OH + 2CO2
Now the equation is balanced.
Answer:
Scientific theory differs from a guess or opinion because a scientific theory is a system of ideas that explains many related observation and is supported by a large body of evidence acquired through scientific investigation while guesses and opinions may not reliably predict an outcome, have evidence to back up the theory
Explanation: