Answer:
B. Better ways to recycle plastics
Explanation:
A chemist might choose to study better ways to recycle plastics because there may be certain types of chemicals that can disintegrate the plastic..
Answer:
20 g Ag
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Chemistry - Stoichiometry</u>
- Using Dimensional Analysis
<u>Chemistry - Atomic Structure</u>
Explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
[RxN] Cu (s) + AgNO₃ (aq) → CuNO₃ (aq) + Ag (s)
[Given] 10 g Cu
<u>Step 2: Identify Conversions</u>
[RxN] 1 mol Cu = 1 mol Ag
Molar Mass of Cu - 63.55 g/mol
Molar Mass of Ag - 197.87 g/mol
<u>Step 3: Stoichiometry</u>
<u />
= 16.974 g Ag
<u>Step 4: Check</u>
<em>We are given 1 sig fig. Follow sig fig rules and round.</em>
16.974 g Ag ≈ 20 g Ag
Answer:
Faster
number
reactants
increases
Explanation:
The rate of reaction refers to how fast or slow a reaction occurs. The rate of reaction is dependent on factors such as surface area, concentration, temperature, nature of reactants, catalyst etc.
The concentration refers to the amount of reactants present. When the acid is made more concentrated, its amount is increased. This increases the number of collisions between the acid particles and the marble chips ultimately leading to increase in the rate of reaction according to Arrhenius theory.
Cesium because it is the only one that belongs to the alkali group.
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
Julie Sandel, the Criminalist made several mistakes in handling this investigation. They include;
It is true that handwriting can be deduced by comparing a suspects's handwriting to the questioned document, however Julie made a mistake by not making the suspect to write many pages. The suspect may intentionally decide to change his/her hand writing. This trick can be neutralized by asking the suspect to write several pages.
Secondly, the suspect ought to have been given a pencil and paper similar to the one used to write the threatening document. Rather, Julie gave the suspect a pen.
Thirdly, the suspect only wrote half a page instead of a full page. Secondly, Julie took only two exemplars when she should have taken more.
She should not have dictated the spelling of any word to the suspect. The examiner is not supposed to do that.
The threatening documents should have first been shown to the document examiner before taking the exemplars.
