Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:?
The hypothesis tests compare weather an event is meant to alter a population mean results, for example, a scientist experiment might have or not have a significant effect over the population results. The test aims to reject the null hypothesis, so what it really want to find out is if the alternative Hypothesis H1 is likely true. The null hypothesis is the probability that the results are not due to chance – if it’s rejected, then the results are due to chance.The level of significance , or so called p-value, is the probability that the null hypothesis (H0) happen , If p is very small then the null hypothesis is rejected - isn’t true- and the alternative Hypothesis is accepted. A higher P value implies a higher probability than results are not happening so that the H0 is accepted and H1 rejected. The null Hypothesis will normally will rejected when the level of significance are either lower than 0.05 or 0.01, the lower P value the higher the level of confidence that the results are due to chance.
Since the first part of the statement (A p is the probability that the results are not due to chance) is correct, and the second part is wrong (…the probability that the null hypothesis (H0) is false), the total statement is false. The correct statement would be as follows : A p is the probability that the results are not due to chance, the probability that the null hypothesis (H0) is true.
A. The ratio of lynx to mountain lions to wolverines is 2:3:1.
Thus, there are 2 lynx in the ratio. If there were 6 lynx, we would have to multiply all of the numbers in the ratio by 3 (because 6/2 = 3) to keep the ratio in the same proportion.
Therefore, because there is 1 wolverine in the ratio, and 1 * 3 = 3, if there were 6 lynx, there would be 3 wolverines.
b. We can use the same ideas that we had in part a to help us in part b.
There are 3 mountain lions in the ratio, but there are 15 mountain lions in the problem. Thus, the multiplier is 5, because 15/3=5.
Therefore, because there are 2 lynx in the ratio, and 2*5 = 10, if there were 15 mountain lions, there would be 10 lynx.
c. There is one wolverine in the ratio, but there are 10 wolverines in the problem. Thus, the multiplier is 10, because 10/1 = 10
Therefore, because there are 3 mountain lions in the ratio, and 3 * 10 = 30, if there were 10 wolverines in the park, then there would be 30 mountain lions.
d. The total number of lynx, mountain lions, and wolverines is 30.
To find out how many of each animal there should be, we must make an equation using the ratio and the variable x.
2x + 3x + 1x = 30
This equation means that the total number of animals together is 30, which is true. Now let's simplify by combining like terms.
6x = 30
Finally, we can simplify by dividing both sides by the coefficient of x, or 6.
x = 5
Thus, going back to our original equation, we know that the amount of lynx is 2x, mountain lions is 3x, and wolverines is 1x.
Lynx = 2x = 2(5) = 10 lynx
Mountain Lion = 3x = 3(5) = 15 mountain lions
Wolverines = 1x = 1(5) = 5 wolverines
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
A) Negative Correlation. B) C. C) B
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>A:</h2>
As the line of best fit is travelling downwards, it is a negative correlation, if the line of best fit is travelling upwards, it is a positive correlation, if the points on the graph are all over the place, there is no correlation.
<h2>B:</h2>
As there are only three types of correlation, the strongest is always the positive.
<h2>C:</h2>
The answer is B because there is no correlation and that means that there shouldn't be a line of best fit.
150/250! Hope this helps :D
