The substance doesn't have a specific name. We just say that that substance is being reduced. Remember this mnemonic - OILRIG where "Oxidation is Loss, Reduction is Gain" of electrons.
The dinosaur dies and is washed away in a flood. The body is buried in sediment (mud or sand) and eventually the body is covered. ... Eventually, the fossil skeleton comes to the surface and is discovered.
According to Bohr's model of the atom, the higher the orbital in which the electrons are found, the higher their energy or excitation state. Therefore, the electrons with the least amount of energy are those at the lowest orbitals, which are closer to the nucleus.
These orbitals are characterized by 4 quantum numbers, namely the principal quantum number (n), orbital angular momentum quantum number (l), the magnetic quantum number (ml), and the electron spin quantum number (ms). The principal quantum number reflects the distance of the electrons from the nucleus with n=1 as the orbital closest to the nucleus. Thus, according to Bohr's model, electrons in the orbital with n=1 have the lowest energy.
Answer:
When the results of a new experiment to test atomic theory do not agree with the theory, scientist will repeat the experiment to make sure that his results are reliable.
Explanation:
In the scientific context, each new experiment must be performed with precision and following the steps of the scientific method.
An experiment that does not provide reliable data to demonstrate a theory must be reviewed in detail and performed again to confirm the data obtained in the first attempt.
A theory is a postulate that tries to explain a natural phenomenon, but whose argument can be discussed or does not have the acceptance of a law. When the theory is proven and there are no arguments against it, it can be universally accepted and becomes a law.
The other options are not valid due to:
- <u><em>Scientists worldwide will reject atomic theory because of the new results</em></u><em>. A theory cannot be discarded without solid arguments or evidence in order to dismiss it and establish a new one.</em>
- <u><em>The scientist will change his results to agree with the accepted theory</em></u><em>. This would be an unethical procedure and unacceptable to the scientific community.</em>
- <em><u>Other scientists will reject the results because they do not agree with the theory</u></em><em>. The opinion of other scientists is not enough to dismiss a theory, if it has a valid scientific basis.</em>
