<span><span><span>9/10 - 7/20=(9x20) - (7x10)= 10x20= 110/200 110 divided by 10/ 200 divided by 10= 11/20. So that brings you to your answer of 11/20. hope this helps :)
</span></span></span>
There is no common ratio or common difference. The first three terms increases more slowly than a cubic, but the last three increase more quickly than the cube of n. The pattern is not obvious to me. When the sequence is cast in recursive terms, you get
... a[n] = (48/13)a[n-2] + (59/39)a[n-1] . . . . a[1] = 2, a[2] = 9
The next term using this rule is 174 34/39, not an integer.
The coefficients p and q for a[n-2] and a[n-1] can be found from

_____
Any sequence of 4 numbers can be matched by a polynomial of degree 3 or less. Here, a calculator's polynomial regression function tells us the rule could be
... a[n] = 4.5n³ -24.5n² +49n -27
Using this rule, the next two terms are 168 and 357.
Are you supposed to estimate or get an exact answer? If you're estimating you can see if the number is close to any perfect squares. In this case 63 is very close to 64, and 48 is very close to 49. The answers can then be estimated to be approximately 8 and 7, respectively.
Answer:
its b 0.6
Step-by-step explanation:
the reason i see that, is because the points that meet on the tax are going by 0.6