Answer:
The solution to this question can be defined as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
In choice a:
Both children between 5 and 15 years old and 160 years old are also the populations of interest, and Kids from 5 to 15 years of age.
In choice b:
These findings could be compared like we do not know whether the groups were randomly selected, and the allocation is still not random; there could be no casual conclusion because the statement is valid even With sample research, and after randomization, filtering, and testing of 160 specimens (instruction vs no-instruction) Its analysis can be common to the community and replicated. There could be explanatory relations generated by experimental research. This analysis is observational and can therefore be used Causal relationships are established.gggg
The answer is C.
x=2
y=-30
(2;-30)
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can find the answer to this question by finding the value of x in both equations.
Let's start off with the first equation: 
To find the value of x, you're going to have to subtract 4 from both sides. This is because you're looking for the value of only x, not x + 4. To leave x alone, you'd have to subtract 4, leaving that side with just x.


The answer to the first equation is x = 1.
Now let's start on the second equation: 
Like before, you're looking for x alone and in this equation, 8 is being added to 2x. Although x itself isn't alone, you'll first start off with 2x since you can simplify it thrughout the process. In this equation, you're going to subtract 8 from both sides to leave the variable x alone.


Now you're left with 2x = 2. Since you're looking for the value of x alone, you're going to divide both sides by 2. Because x is being multiplied by 2(2 times x = 2x) you're going to divide(opposite of multiply), which will cancel out the 2(in 2x).


The answer to the second equation is x = 1.
<em> Since both equations have the same solution, the answer to your question would be </em><em>yes</em><em>.</em>