Answer:
im tryna figure it out to dawg
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
z(critic) = -2.33
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case this is a population proportion test because the observations are simple random sampled and there is a fixed number of trials with only two possible options. Also, n is big enough.
Since this is a population test, the test statistic is z.
Also, this is a one tailed tast because the claim is that the population proportion is less than 0.57.
In this case, for a 0.01 significance level, z(critic) = -2.33
We know that angle MKJ is comprised of angle MKL and angle LKJ. That means if we add MKL and LKJ, we should get 80 degrees, which is the measure of angle MKJ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a4db/0a4db5d941b2e9682f9ea567e1ea3de15b5fb8cd" alt="MKL + LKJ= MKJ \implies \\ 2x+10+3x-5=80 \implies \\ 5x+5=80 \implies\\ 5x=75 \implies \\ x=15"
So, we know that our x is 15. That is not enough to tell whether KL is an angle bisector, because we have to evaluate both MKL and LKJ with x=15, so:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2742/f274218350b8ab06db8c0bca5067372f47b148e3" alt="MKL=2(15)+10 = 40\\ LKJ=3*15-5=40"
So we see that these two angles are actually bisectors, and the third question best describes this phenomenon.
Answer:
$10,000
Step-by-step explanation:
the profit was divided to 2+3+3+5=13 parts
the largest amount of profit
=$26,000×5/13
=$10,000