Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We have a figure given in the shape of a square with a diagonal (x) passing from one edge to another. We need to find the measure of its diagonal if the side of the square is 
units.
We know that, a square has all equal sides. Then, all the sides of the square will be equal to units.
Now, let's find the diagonal.
To find the diagonal of a sqaure from one of its sides, we need to know the formula ⟶ Diagonal = side 
.
By using this formula,
→ The diagonal of the square = 2√5 units.
This question is not complete
Complete Question
Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.
Which of these values of x will prove Sherry's claim is false?
Answer:
When x = 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.
Examples of odd numbers greater than 1 : 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 ....
We would put these odd numbers to test
a) When x = 3
= 1/3 = 0.3333333333
b) When x = 5
= 1/5 = 0.2
c) When x = 7
= 1/7 = 0.142857142
d) When x = 9
= 1/9 = 0.1111111111
e) When x = 11
= 1/11 = 0.0909090909
From the above calculation, we can see that the only odd number greater than 1 that will prove Sherry's theory wrong is when x = 5
Therefore, the value of x that will prove Sherry's claim is false is when x = 5
2m⁴ - 18n⁶
2(m⁴) - 2(9n⁶)
2(m⁴ - 9n⁶)
2(m⁴ - 3m²n³ + 3m²n³ - 9n⁶)
2[m²(m²) - m²(3n³) + 3n³(m²) - 3n³(3n³)]
2[m²(m² - 3n³) + 3n³(m² - 3n³)]
2(m² + 3n³)(m² - 3n³)
1.5/75 = 0.02
0.02 x 100 = $2
Therefore the original price was $2.
an inductive argument
Specific scenarios such as strong evidence stars an inductive argument . It is completed with a conclusion (likely to be true). It is a logical reasoning that allows a conclusion to be untrue. It is called a "valid guess".
