From the calculations, the value of the acceleration due to gravity is 0.38 m/s^2.
<h3>What is weight?</h3>
The weight of an object is obtained as the product of the mass of the body and the acceleration due to gravity.
Thus;
When;
mass = 120 kg
weight = 46 N
acceleration due to gravity = 46 N/120 kg
=0.38 m/s^2
Learn more about acceleration due to gravity :brainly.com/question/13860566
#SPJ1
Answer:
an idealized cycle of processes undergone by rocks in the earth's crust
Answer:
The answer is C. Abundant natural resources
Explanation:
A is wrong because humans cause pollution, B is wrong because we use natural resources and their supply would deteriorate, and D is wrong because we already break down rainforests and they are getting smaller.
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Answer:
diminished and erect( upright)
Explanation:
