a. volume of NO : 41.785 L
b. mass of H2O : 18 g
c. volume of O2 : 9.52 L
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Given
Reaction
4 NH₃ (g) + 5 O2 (g) → 4 NO (g) + 6 H2O (l)
Required
a. volume of NO
b. mass of H2O
c. volume of O2
Solution
Assume reactants at STP(0 C, 1 atm)
Products at 1000 C (1273 K)and 1 atm
a. mol ratio NO : O2 from equation : 4 : 5, so mo NO :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2914/a291428f9833be0c9d4a0f943260f3d8b56abd73" alt="\tt \dfrac{4}{5}\times 0.5=0.4"
volume NO at 1273 K and 1 atm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eb19/1eb19ef98ff05b081aea4e07687aa9c580110123" alt="\tt V=\dfrac{nRT}{P}=\dfrac{0.4\times 0.08206\times 1273}{1}=41.785~L"
b. 15 L NH3 at STP ( 1mol = 22.4 L)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d244a/d244aaa0b046e3e3a72bbe9a5c74642da01c04b2" alt="\tt \dfrac{15}{22.4}=0.67~mol"
mol ratio NH3 : H2O from equation : 4 : 6, so mol H2O :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6432b/6432ba7f219dc84baa528b4a0f06f1653a38e1dc" alt="\tt \dfrac{6}{4}\times 0.67=1"
mass H2O(MW = 18 g/mol) :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d340/6d340e2336f5cfd0a28845e6e3b7cce86366ad46" alt="\tt mass=mol\times MW=1\times 18=18~g"
c. mol NO at 1273 K and 1 atm :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e627/7e627a4664e4f0663ca820df50c67aa897f28e71" alt="\tt n=\dfrac{PV}{RT}=\dfrac{1\times 35.5}{0.08206\times 1273}=0.34"
mol ratio of NO : O2 = 4 : 5, so mol O2 :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ca3b/9ca3b21d2cdf257bd207d22c4de395245aad183a" alt="\tt \dfrac{5}{4}\times 0.34=0.425"
Volume O2 at STP :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac38a/ac38a9834d20aa1ffeb177818cce09eaaadc8474" alt="\tt 0.425\times 22.4=9.52~L"
I believe that the answer is D.
I hope this helps. :)
Answer:
burning wood be a chemical change because it wouldn’t be able to go back to its original form. A physical change would be a broken pencil. The pencil is still a pencil, it’s just a physical change.But if it were burned it would be a chemical change.
Explanation:
You should put a picture or finish the question
<u>Answer:</u> Carbon-carbon double bond is stronger and shorter than the single bond.
<u>Explanation:</u>
It is given that carbon-carbon double bond has greater energy than the carbon-carbon single bond.
Bond energy is directly proportional to the bond strength, which means that the double bond will have greater strength than single bond and triple bond has the greatest strength of all the bonds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5884c/5884cfd535479149e8b3d85ce9dc0fbe7661b846" alt="\text{Bond energy}\propto \text{Bond strength}"
Bond energy is inversely proportional to the bond length of the carbon-carbon bond. This means that more is the bond energy, shorter will be the bond and vice-versa.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad946/ad9464ecce74ec60c9c36ed834d7e9b594f03e9e" alt="\text{Bond energy}\propto \frac{1}{\text{Bond Length}}"
Hence, carbon-carbon double bond is stronger and shorter than the single bond.