1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fiesta28 [93]
2 years ago
13

HELP ME!!! NO LINKS!!! Compare and Contrast the scientific definitions of theory and law. Explain why the first law of thermodyn

amics is not considered to be a theory.
Physics
1 answer:
Nataly_w [17]2 years ago
3 0
The date the model was published.

The use of “laws” originated prior to science splitting from natural philosophy. There’s an implicit assumption that God as the creator laid down both moral and natural laws, with the theologian concerned with the former and the natural philosopher concerned with the latter.

“Theory” begins to take hold in the late 1700s and, very roughly speaking, is used to describe more complex models. “Law” eventually became nearly archaic, although still used to describe very pithy models (Amdahl’s Law, Gustafson’s Law).

The word “model” is gradually superseding both of them.

People have tried to come up with hard-and-fast rules to distinguish them, but scientists are unruly beasts, and use whatever language suits them in the moment.
You might be interested in
A 3.0-kg block starts at rest at the top of a 37° incline, which is 5.0 m long. Its speed when it reaches the bottom is 2.0 m/s.
Mama L [17]

Answer: f_{r} = 16.49N

Explanation: The object is placed on an inclined plane at an angle of 37° thus making it weight have two component,

W_{x} = horizontal component of the weight = mgsinФ

W_{y} = vertical component of weight = mgcosФ

Due to the way the object is positioned, the horizontal component of force will accelerate the object thus acting as an applied force.

by using newton's law of motion, we have that

mgsinФ - f_{r} = ma

where m = mass of object=5kg

a = acceleration= unknown

Ф = angle of inclination = 37°

g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.8m/s^{2}

f_{r} = frictional force = unknown

we need to first get the acceleration before the frictional force which is gotten by using the equation below

v^{2} = u^{2} + 2aS

where v = final velocity = 2m/s

u = initial velocity = 0m/s (because the object started from rest)

a= unknown

S= distance covered = length of plane = 5m

2^{2} = 0^{2} + 2*a*5\\\\4= 10 *a\\\\a = \frac{4}{10} \\a = 0.4m/s^{2}

we slot in a into the equation below to get frictional force

mgsinФ - f_{r} = ma

3 * 9.8 * sin 37 - f_{r} = 3* 0.4

17.9633 - f_{r} =  1.2

f_{r} = 17.9633 - 1.2

f_{r} = 16.49N

4 0
3 years ago
You and a friend each hold a lump of wet clay. Each lump has a mass of 30 grams. You each toss your lump of clay into the air, w
Vesna [10]

Answer:

\ \text{m/s}

Explanation:

u_1 = Velocity of one lump = 3x+3y-3z

u_2 = Velocity of the other lump = -4x+0y-4z

m = Mass of each lump = 30\ \text{g}

The collision is perfectly inelastic as the lumps stick to each other so we have the relation

mu_1+mu_2=(m+m)v\\\Rightarrow m(u_1+u_2)=2mv\\\Rightarrow v=\dfrac{u_1+u_2}{2}\\\Rightarrow v=\dfrac{3x+3y-3z-4x+0y-4z}{2}\\\Rightarrow v=-0.5x+1.5y-3.5z=\ \text{m/s}

The velocity of the stuck-together lump just after the collision is \ \text{m/s}.

4 0
3 years ago
In deep space, there is very little friction. Once they launch a probe into deep space, where there are no external forces actin
Charra [1.4K]

Answer:

move at constant velocity.

Explanation:

Newton's first law (also known as law of inertia) states that:

"when the net force acting on an object is zero, the object will keep its state of rest or if it is moving, it will continue moving at constant velocity".

In the case of the probe, friction in deep space is negligible, therefore when the engine is shut down, there are no more forces acting on the probe: the net force therefore will be zero, so the probe will move at constant velocity.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why the effect of gravitational force is more in liquid than in solid?​
LekaFEV [45]
  • Gravitational force depends only on mass and distance, not on the state of matter.
  • The forces of attraction between molecules in matter are electromagnetic in nature, not gravitational.
  • These attractive forces are stronger in a solid than in a liquid than in a gas.
  • Gravitational forces between molecules is completely negligible compared to the em forces.

So, key answer is inter-molecular forces of solids is stronger than liquids.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the ability to react with air
Bond [772]
Reactivity is the answer
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • All charged objects create an electric field around them. What two factors determine the strength of two electric fields upon th
    7·1 answer
  • Bicyclists in the Tour de France do enormous amounts of work during a race. For example, the average power per kilogram generate
    10·1 answer
  • The molecule that functions as the reducing agent (electron donor) in a redox or oxidation-reduction reaction _____. Group of an
    11·1 answer
  • How high off the ground is a a book that has 120 J of potential energy and a 4-kg mass ​
    10·1 answer
  • Davien and Jackson are headed to a beach that is 50km from school. At noon, Davien leaves his house that is 10 km closer to the
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone pls help me. WILL MARK U BRAINLIEST!!!
    14·1 answer
  • 2. A solenoid. Suppose the south end of a bar magnet was introduced to the right end of this solenoid at a constant velocity. Wh
    14·1 answer
  • In which case would electrical potential energy be built up and stored in the electric field?
    13·1 answer
  • A diverging lens has a focal length of 18.6 cm.
    13·1 answer
  • What is the magnitude of velocity for a 2,000 kg car possessing 3,000 kg(*)m/s of momentum?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!