The correct choice is "cannot be determined" because of weight and height differences
The balanced equation for the above reaction is as follows;
2Al + 3Br₂ --> 2AlBr₃
stoichiometry of Al to Br₂ is 2:3
there are 5.0 mol of Al and 6.0 mol of Br₂
if Al is the limiting reactant,
if 2 mol of Al reacts with 3 mol of Br₂
then 5.0 mol of Al reacts with - 3/2 x 5 = 7.5 mol of Br₂
but only 6 mol of Br₂ is present therefore Br₂ is the limiting reactant.
if 3 mol of Br₂ reacts with 2 mol of Al
then 6.0 mol of Br₂ reacts with - 2/3 x 6 = 4 mol of Al
the molar ratio of Al to AlBr₃ is 2:2
the number of moles of AlBr₃ formed is 4 mol of AlBr₃
amount of excess Al - 5.0 mol - 4.0 mol = 1 mol
therefore at the end of the reaction,
1 mol of Al and 4 mol of AlBr₃ in the reaction vessel
From the balanced equation:
<span>1mol C3H8 requires 5mol O2 for combustion </span>
<span>Molar mass C3H8 = 44g/mol </span>
<span>8.8g C3H8 = 8.8/44 = 0.2mol C3H8 </span>
<span>This will require 5*0.2 = 1.0mol O2 </span>
<span>Molar mass O2 = 32g/mol </span>
<span>Therefore 32g of O2 required.
</span>
Answer:
not valid
Explanation:
Expert judgment is a useful validation method to verify the reliability of an investigation that is defined as “an informed opinion of people with experience in the subject, who are recognized by others as qualified experts in it, and who can give information, evidence, judgments and assessments ”
After submitting an instrument for comparison to the consultation and expert opinion, it must meet two quality criteria: validity and reliability. The validity of content is often established based on two situations, one that concerns the design of a test and the other, the validation of an instrument subject to translation and standardization procedures to adapt it to different cultural meanings. It is here that the task of the expert becomes a fundamental task to eliminate irrelevant aspects, incorporate those that are essential and / or modify those that require it.