Ok so if each side is 4.53 cm, we can multiply 4.53 x 4.53 x 4.53 to get the volume (since v= l x w x h). Density equals mass/volume, so
519 g/4.53 cm
114.57 g/cm^3 (since none of the units cancel)
Answer:
2.86 m
Explanation:
Given:
M₁ = 10 kg
M₂ = 5 kg
= 0.5
height, h = 5 m
distance traveled, s = 2 m
spring constant, k = 250 N/m
now,
the initial velocity of the first block as it approaches the second block
u₁ = √(2 × g × h)
or
u₁ = √(2 × 9.8 × 5)
or
u₁ = 9.89 m/s
let the velocity of second ball be v₂
now from the conservation of momentum, we have
M₁ × u₁ = M₂ × v₂
on substituting the values, we get
10 × 9.89 = 5 × v₂
or
v₂ = 19.79 m/s
now,
let the velocity of mass 2 when it reaches the spring be v₃
from the work energy theorem, we have
Work done by the friction force = change in kinetic energy of the mass 2
or

or
v₃ = 20.27 m/s
now, let the spring is compressed by the distance 'x'
therefore, from the conservation of energy
we have
Energy of the spring = Kinetic energy of the mass 2
or

on substituting the values, we get

or
x = 2.86 m
Answer:
When did humans learn that the Earth is not the center of the universe?
Answer
1
Follow
Request
More
Ad by Odoo
Odoo: The open-source CRM!
Keep track of leads and opportunities, personalize sales cycles, and control forecasts with Odoo CRM!
Learn More
4 Answers
Asked in 3 Spaces


Science - Next Generation
Alexander Somm
, Consultant, Investor Relations at Novelpharm AG (2015-present)
Answered Oct 16
What, it isn’t?!
Sorry, I had to.
As far as I have read and understood, the Sumerians and later the Babylonians both had astronomical calendars that already differentiated planets and stars. Earth was not the center to them, the Sun likely was. That was around 2,200 - 1,600 BC.
After that, Greek philosopher Aristarchus of Samos (310 - 230 BC) was the first (recorded) to have believed the solar system was organized around the Sun, rather than the Earth. His heliocentric model was unpopular during Aristarchus’ lifetime, although it would inspire astronomers centuries later, such as Copernicus and Galileo.
Now, there are numerous archeological findings (cave paintings) and studies, that all suggest an understanding of complex astronomy in prehistoric times dating back as far as 40,000 years. This also explains how early, prehistoric migrants may have navigated the seas.
Explanation:
hope it helps
have a good day
The answer to this question is <span>13,537</span>
Answer:
» An electron is lighter than a proton.
<u>explanation</u><u>:</u>

hence it's mass number is zero

hence it's mass number is 4
<u>Therefore</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>proton</u><u> </u><u>is</u><u> </u><u>heavier</u><u> </u><u>than</u><u> </u><u>electron</u>
» An electron has a small charge magnitude than a proton.
<u>Explanation</u><u>:</u>
An electron has charge of -1 while proton has charge of +2, therefore electron is less deflected by any energetic fields than a proton